09.26.08

The Passion of Christ

Posted in 1, Family, Life, Music, News, Politics, personal, ادب, عام, مقالات tagged , , , , , , , at 6:05 pm by mhr2

The Passion of Christ

Audios Item Description

Attachments of the Item ( 2 )

1.
The Passion of Christ.mp3The Passion of Christ
6.8 MB
The Passion of Christ.mp3The Passion of Christ.mp3The Passion of Christ.mp3
2.
The Passion of Christ.rmThe Passion of Christ
3.3 MB
The Passion of Christ.rmThe Passion of Christ.rmThe Passion of Christ.rm

09.24.08

How to End Racism !

Posted in 1, Family, Life, Music, News, Politics, personal, ادب, حوارات ولقاءات, عام, مقالات tagged , , , , , , , at 7:27 pm by mhr2

How to End Racism Recent events remind us that racism remains rampant. Yet we can easily end racism through understanding and education.

People must realize that God created all humans from one couple, thus making the entire human race one large extended family. God says:

“O mankind! Be careful of your duty to your Lord who created you from a single soul (Adam), and from him (Adam) He created his wife (Eve); and from the two of them He spread abroad a multitude of men and women…” (Qur’an 4:1).

Furthermore, we must understand that no race is superior to another. We appreciate a garden having many different flowers because we realize that each adds something to the beauty of the entire arrangement. This is why we do not object to the color of any flower. In a similar way we can see the world as a garden decorated with people of different colors. Let us appreciate that each variety of people contributes something to the spice of life in this world. God says:

“O mankind! We have created you male and female, and have made you nations and tribes that you may know each other. Verily, the noblest of you in the sight of Allah[1], is the most pious (righteous) of you.” (Qur’an 49:13) The noblest are the most obedient to God. Such persons may belong to any race or country. What really matters is their conduct and behavior. The prophet Muhammad[2] publicly declared that Arabs are not superior to non-Arabs, and one color is not superior to another. In a day when light-skinned people could not imagine a black person as their leader, the prophet appointed a black person, Usaamah, the son of Zaid, as a leader.

As a result of following these teachings, many people have banished racism from their thoughts and actions. You can still see racial harmony today in the mosques of cosmopolitan cities. You will find people of various colors worshipping together, all with equal status before God. Rich or poor, black or white, king or pauper all line up side by side to worship. No special preference is given to anyone based on color or social status. The leader in a mosque is appointed for his learning in the religious sciences, regardless of skin color. There is no such concept as a ‘black mosque’ or ‘white mosque’. Islam removes such destructive concepts.

____________________

[1] Allah is the name of God used by Arabic-Speaking Christians and Jews, and all Muslims.

[2] May peace, and the blessings of Allah, be on His messengers Muhammad, Jesus, Moses and others.

http://www.alriyadh.com/Contents/30-11-2002/Mainpage/images/L8.jpg

http://www.alriyadh.com/2006/01/07/img/071068.jpg

09.22.08

A Letter Addressed to Intellectual and Opinion Leaders in the ‘West’

Posted in 1, Family, Life, Music, News, Politics, personal, ادب, حوارات ولقاءات, خواطر وشعر, عام, مقالات tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , at 4:44 pm by mhr2

A Call for Reassessment

A Letter Addressed to Intellectual and Opinion Leaders in the ‘West’

From the Conference on

Glorification of the Sanctities of  Islam

Held in Kuwait city, Kuwait, January 22-24, 2007

- Preamble

In the name of Allah, the Unique One, who is no God but He, and no one deserves to be worshiped but He, the Lord of the prophets: Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad, the seal of all prophets, (Peace be upon all of them).

This letter was drafted by a group of Muslim scholars and intellectuals who recently gathered to discuss development in the relationship with the ‘West’, and the best and most logical manner to deal with the acceleration of infringements on the sanctities of Islam and Muslims by individuals, and by governmental, religious, and media organizations in the ‘West’.

We, the signatories to this letter, address western thinkers, intellectuals, and decision makers as well as the leaders of grass-root movements and religious institutions. To all of them we state the following regarding this current phenomenon:

When an entire nation faces repeated and accelerated aggressions directed towards what is respected and holy to its people by groups from other nations, reactions will emerge and questions will be raised as to the rationale behind these transgressions, and the environment which created the milieu for these continued attacks. Nonetheless, it is for the benefit of all humanity that these transgressions and attacks come to an end.

No other community on the face of the earth today suffers from occupation, injustice and transgression from certain western forces more than Muslim world. No other peoples or nations are currently mocked, ridiculed, and hence suffered because of the western attacks on their religion and their holy symbols as much as the Muslim world. This phenomenon has reached an unacceptable level of infringement and injustice considering that these actions are directed at a worldwide culture and exceptional civilization with an immense history and against a divine religion representing more than a quarter of the world population. For this reason, we believe it is important to draw attention to our position concerning this phenomenon to allow for mistakes to be addressed and path to be rectified.

- Present Relationship

We realize that the western perspective regarding Islam was not initially positive for several reasons, the most important of which is that Europeans did not deal directly with Islamic culture which led to a continuing sense of unease and apprehension. Disunited Europeans eventually attempted to create a Christian front against Islam. Islam became the exterior enemy capable of unifying a Europe which was until then no more than scattered groups killing one another.

There is no doubt that generalizations may lead to misjudgments. In this regard, we are aware of how Europe and America have attempted over past centuries to rid themselves of the western civilization’s deficiencies in dealing with the concept of ‘Others’.  However, incidents during the past few years have totally shattered these attempts.

In this letter, when we address the ‘West’, we mean western society in general.  We are not only addressing the forces antagonistic to Islam, but also those who are fair, and we realize that the ‘West’ is diverse.

- Examples of Aggressions

We draw the attention of the intellectuals and opinion leaders of the ‘West’ to the gravity of the increasing and accelerating attacks.  It is unconceivable and unacceptable to witness – in less than three years – a series of attacks on what is sacred to us beginning with an assault on our Lord’s holy book (the Noble Quran) by the authoring, publication and distribution of a parody of the Quran in which the beliefs, legislations, ethics, and history of our religion are ridiculed.  This was followed by a prejudiced and malicious campaign against the person of our Prophet (peace be upon him) describing him with the most repulsive attributes and picturing  him with the most mocking and ridiculing caricatures.

The source of these attacks emerged from a Danish newspaper spreading to several European countries where certain news outlets supported and others encouraged the spread of these caricatures.  The situation grew even worse when the Roman Catholic Pope described Islam, the Quran, and the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) in a prepared public speech with attributes that are unjust, to say the least.

Muslims worldwide are also closely following the repeated assaults on the noble Quran at the hands of American soldiers in detention centers of Abu Ghraib in Iraq and Guantanamo in Cuba where the degradation of human beings was coupled with the humiliations of the Quran.

It continues to surprise Muslims worldwide to follow the news about infringements of personal freedoms of Muslim citizens and residents in the largest capitals of western countries.  Let us also not forget the repeated attacks on mosques in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan sometimes through direct destruction, or by other means such as forced entry into mosques under the pretext of rooting out and killing militants, which, in turn, leads to the killing of innocent people inside these mosques.

There is also an air of superiority transpiring from the sayings of many leaders and politicians, the writings of some thinkers, and also in diverse media productions such as movies, series and novels that made it a habit of stigmatizing Islam with defects, violence and terrorism.

We are perplexed by the continued lack of public outcry from the majority of intellectual and opinion leaders against these repeated acts of aggression which occur in your countries in the ‘West’. It leads us to question which side you belong to: the side of freedom for all, protecting human rights of others, and supporting the global ethic of respect, or the side of repression and curbing other people’s desires to preserve their own identities?  We indeed ask:  Are you siding with the insolence and mockery of the prophets in the name of the freedom of expression, or siding with freedom against the phenomenon of repression and suppression?

- The Attack on the Prophet of Islam (Peace be upon him)

Although some civilizations have engaged in wars against Muslims in the past, most have not retained the hatred heritage toward the Prophet of Islam when compared with the small countries of Europe and their churches at the same time.  Furthermore, Christian animosity toward Islam and the Prophet of Islam outside of western Europe were never transformed into what has been observed in western Europe; an historical abhorrence which was celebrated and emphasized during religious occasions and was portrayed on the walls and ceilings of cathedrals and houses of worship.  It is a phenomenon worth studying and it is more important to limit its negative impact.

We question the reasons behind the endeavors of certain people in the ‘West’ to destroy the reputation of historical and contemporary role models. For those who live with no role models, we believe they will have no future; and a nation with no sense of history is like a building with no foundation.

Is this, perhaps, the fundamental raison d’etre for the focused attack on our Prophet? Do certain movements in the ‘West’ – calling for materialism and decadence – want human beings in general, and Muslims in particular, to abandon their desire to follow the steps of enlightened historical role models?

We are convinced that attacks such as these recent ones on the best role models in our tradition are nothing but a clarion call in a chain of events attempting to eradicate the historical value of these exemplars.

We remain confident that the Muslim world will never waver when it comes to defending the Prophet of Islam and all other Prophets. This is a dividing line which we will never allow it to be crossed on the false pretext of free expression of opinions or views.  Furthermore, the Muslim world can not be forced to accept all the outcomes of  freedom of expression in the ‘West’ just as the ‘West’ does not want to accept some of the outcomes of other human freedoms in the ‘East’.

We call upon western intellectuals to take a strong stance in dealing with these attacks. We expect they will be more concerned with protecting the accomplishments of the western civilization rather than protecting the ‘rights’ claimed by some in the ‘West’ to scorn others and ridicule Prophets.

- The Aggression on Al-Aqsa Mosque (The Mosque of all the Prophets)

We consider the occupation and repeated attacks on Al-Aqsa mosque to be yet another example of aggressive behavior on what is considered sacred and holy to Muslims everywhere. These transgressions are happening with the support or silence of most western governments and the approval of some western religious movements as well.

It is worth noting that the Veto right of United States of America is rarely used in the United Nations for any purpose but to defend repeated Zionist attacks on occupied Palestinian land and to protect Jewish domination on Al-Aqsa mosque, which Muslims worldwide will never forfeit.

We reiterate our inquiries to the intellectual and opinion leaders: What is your position regarding these transgressions on what is sacred to Muslims in Palestine, and regarding injustices incurred by the Palestinian people who are deprived of their most basic rights.

We observe the blatant contradiction of the ‘West’ when it calls upon Muslims to adopt western forms of democracy while the same western governments agonize over what kind of free elections and what form of government Palestinians can be free to choose.

The silence of western intellectuals and thinkers about these transgressions on what is sacred to Muslims in Palestine is humiliating; it is a stain on the foreheads of those who champion freedom and democracy in the ‘West’.

We call upon you to remove this stain by joining forces with many impartial intellectuals worldwide who are actively defending the rights of peoples and nations to liberate their occupied lands, to recover their holy sites, to fight for their rights to freely choose their representatives and those who would manage their political and social affairs, to retain their human dignity and their ability to resist humiliation and occupation, and to stand against injustice using all legitimate means.

- Mocking the Islamic Veil

Personal freedom is central to western democracies. It can be seen in western contemporary social life and also in intellectual literature. It should then be one of the fundamental rights of women in a democracy to have the personal freedom to choose their own clothes as far as they are not contradicting any general moral or social value.

The Muslim world is astonished to watch the increased attacks and mockery of the veil of Muslim women in the ‘West’. These attacks directly contradict democratic principles which are currently being promoted in the Muslim world. The world’s women-rights groups have not taken any concerted steps to defend the rights of Muslim Women. We cannot help but wonder how the right of nudity is accepted and defended while the right of decency is attacked and questioned?

One of the basic human rights in the ‘West’ is the right for one’s identity to be preserved and even protected and not attacked. How can the ‘West’ allow attacks on its own Muslim citizens for exercising the right to wear what suit them? Furthermore, we ask: what happened to the religious, social, and intellectual heritage of the western world? Modest western women would –and still do– wear decent clothing which closely resemble the Islamic dress code as in the cases of nuns and countryside women?

If the ‘West’ has abandoned this legacy of decency, does it mean the rest of the world must follow suit?  We reject the ‘war on decency’ in today’s world.  We also do not accept the notion that this is the price to be paid for modernity and prosperity. Could the attacks on the veil of Muslim women result from the fact that, in itself, it represents just another symbol of decency?

The laws and regulations that were passed recently by several European countries to limit the rights of women to wear the veil appear to be a clear negation of their civil liberties.  We wonder: is this happening because of a continued sense of animosity toward Islam by some, or because of the anti-decency position of some liberal supporters, or is it simply to please supporters of social and moral decadence? These are questions directed at western thinkers and intellectuals by the Muslim world.  Our expectation is that they must stand firm against double standards in western intellectual norms which this phenomenon points to.

- Confrontation of Ideas

Islam has been stained with numerous accusations in the last few years by a group of thinkers and religious and political personalities in the ‘West’.  The accusations range from allegations that Islam has spread by the sword, that ‘Reason’ has no place in the Islamic intellect, that Islam is a religion of terrorism and backwardness, and other false accusations.

This letter does not aim at providing a detailed refutation of each of these allegations. We, nevertheless, highlight the fact that they contradict rational discussions and also breach basic research principles accepted worldwide. It seems, however, that these allegations correspond well with the policy of ‘War of Ideas’ which some American influential institutions are calling for in order to alter Islam.

We recognize that Islam has propagated through Jihad for the cause of Allah and it also has spread by other peaceful means. In fact, all civilizations have acquired and used force to preserve and defend their accomplishments and values.  Moreover, we draw your attention to the fact that the concept of ‘Just War’ was accepted by the European Church and the secular movements in order to preserve the interests of the western civilization. Why then deny the same philosophical position when it comes to Islam?

Any person studying world history would realize that millions of people in many countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines as well as some Asian and African nations have accepted Islam even though they were never invaded or attacked by any Muslim military force.

Another question: Why does Islam continue to grow worldwide nowadays and more particularly in the ‘West’ with no use of any military force to propagate it?  It is happening, we believe, because of Islam’s inherited influence and its harmony with the best of human nature.

As for the fundamental place of Reason in Islamic civilization in comparison with other civilizations, we must begin by stressing that historians unanimously agree that western history is full of incidents which either disregard the role of reason or idolize it; thus in fact, moving from one extreme to the opposite.

On the other hand, the Muslim world has been known for its moderation in the use of reason to properly serve humanity.  We ask: why do certain religious leaders in the ‘West’ try to attack the role of reason in Islam? Is it to conceal deficiencies they encounter within their own faith, or to align forces with the secular movement in its confrontation with Islam?

We call upon Church leaders to reexamine their own beliefs beginning with the concept of divinity.  Upon rigorous introspection and research, they will perhaps recognize the more-than-ample rational contradictions that this concept holds.  The overpowering domination of Church leaders and their hostility towards science and reason could have been the main reason for the revolution against the Church in the past, and could also have inspired the materialistic and atheist wave which has developed throughout western countries.

We invite western intellectuals and thinkers to unshackle themselves from an intellectual position that was inherited from unjust religious wars, which the ‘West’ itself called ‘Crusades’; wars that perfectly fit today’s definition of ‘terrorist warfare’.  As for those who accuse us today of terrorism, they were and still are the cause of most of the horrors and catastrophes of wars that have decimated tens of millions of persons in our contemporary world, especially the two World Wars, which the Muslims had no role in igniting.

Intellectuals in the Islamic world continue to notice the changes taking place in the tactics used by some adversaries in the ‘West’ who are shifting their position from attacking Muslims to attacking Islam, and from efforts to change Muslims to attempts to ‘reform’ Islam.  We pronounce: Islam is in no need for a contemporary Protestantism, which would corrupt it, because Islam is well known for its ability to renew itself.  Furthermore, Islam is spreading with no need to modify it. We question then, why some in the ‘West’ demand to alter Islam?

It is interesting for us to note that extreme egoism has caused some western intellectuals and decision makers to call for intellectual and religious reforms in a faith in which they barely know.  They call for the reform of Islam simply because it is different from what was agreed upon in contemporary Christianity when it merged with western liberalism to form a new religion whose followers are arrogant enough to demand that others must change their own positions to match and adhere to the norms of this new religion.

We are confident that our religion, which will never be altered, is quite capable of healing the problems of western civilization.  This may explain the uphill struggle of some opponents in the ‘West’ who are trying to get rid of the pure form of Islam. Furthermore, we believe that to maintain an unaltered Islam would obliterate for some the ‘End of History’ myth.

We strongly reject any attempt to repress the right of our community to adhere to its own intellectual reasoning system.  We affirm at the same time our interest to get acquainted with other civilizations and to benefit from what they have, and is useful to us.

It is important to stress that the western thoughts in the domain of values, morals, legislation, and creeds are neither universal nor sacred.  Attempts to make them as such will never succeed.  Muslim societies in general are beginning to believe that attacks on Islam by some westerners under the banner of ‘War of Ideas’ only reflect their own fear of the enlightened message of Islam which stands firm against western domination.

What you are accustomed to call the ‘War of Ideas’ is a preference which we do not approve of.  Nevertheless, we will never hesitate to face up to whatever hurts our sentiments. The theatre of war in the field of ideas is our own battleground. We will excel in this war not necessarily because of the superiority of our intellectuals or decision makers, but rather because of our unwavering confidence and certainty in our fundamental principles.  We are confident of our ability not only to reveal, but also to cure the severe contradictions western civilization has in the domain of ideas, intellect, and beliefs.

- How to Explain the Attacks on our Sanctities?

It appears from the official statements of some western leaders and from verbal or written opinions representing the prevailing intellectual trend today that the attack on the Islamic world is not an isolated event or in response to a specific incident.  It rather appears to be the outcome of a master plan that was carefully constructed to eclipse the impact of the Islamic community on the world.

The development of this master plan could be detected in the use of the word ‘Crusade’ used by U.S. President George W. Bush in describing his open war on what is being called ‘terrorism’ in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere.

It could also explain statements by the former Italian Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi, who claimed that western civilization was superior to that of Islam. Berlusconi said that Islam was ‘racist, inflammatory, and uneducated’ ignoring Islam’s long history of accomplishments. Such statements were also echoed by the former German Chancellor who remarked that he would not allow Islam to become a threat to the European civilization. An important question comes to mind here: What is the real purpose of this multifaceted attack on Islam?

If the explanation is the freedom of expression in criticizing other religions, then we do not see in contemporary western literature similar attacks on other religions such as Hinduism, Judaism, and Buddhism.  We only observe continuous attacks on Islam. We also wonder: could this campaign of aggression be in response to recent political incidents? We must also disagree with this reasoning because aggressions against Islam have long preceded the recent events when a small group of Muslims has been accused of initiating aggression.

Many Muslim leaders and intellectuals perceive current attacks on Islamic rituals and sanctities as a direct result of the realization of some western leaders and intellectuals that the Islamic world is experiencing a revival, and is going through a fundamental renaissance.  It also appears they realize that the Islamic world is resuming its mission to reform humanity to bring real happiness, and that Islam is becoming a real contender in intellectual and civilizational areas.

We examine with interest the report published by the ‘Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance’ which estimated the number of Muslims in 2003 to be 1.226 billions representing 19% of the world population that year.  The report also confirms that Islam is the only religion whose adherents’ proportion is increasing while the proportion of the other major religions’ adherents is decreasing.  The organization also predicts that before 2023, Islam will be the world’s first religion.  Could these and other similar statistics be the driving factor behind the return of the fear of the Islamic world among certain western thinkers and leaders? The question is directed to you.

We are convinced of double-standards when we witness western leaders and intellectuals stress upon the value of individual liberty and democratic processes while at the same time they suppress freedom rights for Muslims in western countries.  They promote the intolerance of Islamic symbols appearing in the daily lives of Muslims in the ‘West’, and even attempt to harm Muslims in their own homelands.  Moreover, they continuously export oppression and colonial domination to the Islamic world.

We notice that the atmosphere of hostility from some western leaders has permeated some populations under the effect of the media and the hostile policies which are being falsely justified both culturally and intellectually.  We believe the western media is no longer completely independent from policymaking.  It rather appears sharing roles with decision makers.  As a result of the media’s ability to incite people and disseminate policies, a more dangerous effect is also developing: It is the deterrence of nations from accepting the divine guidance.

It is interesting to note that the religious movement in the ‘West’ has strongly participated in this campaign by either concealing the truth about Islam, attempting to defame it and alienate people away from it, or by hiding the explicit ‘Good News’ pointing to of the prophet-hood of Muhammad (Peace be upon him) in the Old and New Testaments.

There is another trend of concerted political and media attacks on any impartial western writing which appears to be unbiased towards Muslims.  This trend confirms to us that certain western political and intellectual forces consider it in their best interest that people in the ‘West’ get a somber image of Muslims and the religion of Islam.

- In Conclusion

We affirm the importance of proper inter-cultural dialogue in reaching the truth and limiting unjust aggression on others. Nonetheless, we are certain that talking about dialogue for some people is nothing more than a way to justify actions of the ‘West’ and to suppress the dissenting opinions and the authentic Islamic thinking and ideals. We stress the fact that communication between civilizations is quite possible in today’s world but on the condition of establishing justice and fairness.

The contemporary western civilization is an outcome of the accumulation of the accomplishments of all previous world civilizations and their civic and progressive creativities. Nevertheless, the ‘West’ desires to monopolize its benefits for itself, and only for those who circle in its orbit. The ‘West’ appears to be adamant about depriving the Muslim world of the means of technological and materialistic progress to keep it occupied with inter-fighting and struggles fueled and instigated by the ‘West’ itself.

The stagnation of Muslims in development and creativity – due to many reasons – is an exception to the norms of the history of the Islamic civilization. This stagnation does not indicate that we are a backward community in terms of civilization or values. On the contrary, the Muslim world community encompasses a wealth of morals, ideals, values, and sources of guidance and enlightenment, and it will never abandon them.  It will always carry the responsibility of calling humanity to these virtues.

We call upon you to reconsider the position of claiming civilizational supremacy over others. We further urge intellectual and opinion leaders among you to maintain neutrality and fairness with regard to Islam, its noble values, and its good virtues which has bequeathed humanity over ages.

The current situation of our Islamic world might not be great, but the foundations of Islam in creed, legislation, civilization, and ethics are nonetheless magnificent and applicable to every time and place.   Furthermore, it is important to state that while the ‘West’ has achieved strong materialistic progress and technological innovation, the foundations of its civilization as they currently stand are not beneficial to humanity in the long run.

The defects of our current situation do not affect our conviction of the value of our religion and our civilization for humanity.  This is why we are addressing you, the opinion leaders and decision makers, and we address through you the silent majority of the western peoples as well as those who are implicated in the campaigns of aggression on our sanctities and our resources and we demand from all the following:

First: Stop inflicting injustice upon us.  Bring to an end the interference in our affairs, and stop attacking what is sacred and holy to our Muslim world community. Continuing these acts of aggression will not serve your vital economic interests in our countries.  The only way to preserve these interests is through justice and fairness.

Second: We call upon you to join forces with us to stop media and cultural campaigns which insult what is sacred to us, ridicule our noble Quran, and attack the character of our Prophet. Otherwise, the Muslim community will have no choice but to continue exercising its legitimate right to resist the western oppression in all its forms: cultural, civilizational, political, and military.

Third: Rather than allocating resources and efforts on current campaigns aiming at containing and dominating us culturally, economically, politically and militarily, we urge you to allocate some of your intellectual and research efforts to determine the real causes of the rising civilizational conflict between us.  We also urge you to research and study the real essence of the message of our Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him).  We call upon you to open your minds and hearts to comprehend and appreciate the universality of Islam and the realities of our religion before attacking them, or calling people away from them.

Fourth: It is more important for western intellectuals and leaders to focus on reforming their own countries before interfering in the affairs of other nations and civilizations. The ‘West’ is undeniably in need of several fundamental reforms. It is far more imperative to tackle these reforms than to impose western reform projects on the Muslim world. We are confident that western nations and societies are heading towards a grievous abyss of incoherence, deterioration, and cultural bankruptcy if their leaders continue their approach of exporting corruption and inequalities to the rest of the world.  All these mounting abuses will eventually return back as arrows hitting the hearts of those who spread and propagate them.

To reiterate: This letter is a call to the intellectual leaders in western countries to implement a ‘Western Reform Initiative’ to rekindle the true virtues of faith which all Prophets called for, to pay due respect to these Prophets (Peace be upon them), to aid the innocent, and to prevent injustice and aggression in the entire world and not just in the ‘West’.

Before making calls to reform the Islamic world (or the Greater Middle East as they call it), the thinkers and leaders of the ‘West’ should adopt a project to reform their own societies with regard to family values, marriage and virtue.  We also call for a western economic reform, which will protect people and individuals from being ‘terrorized’ by corporations and capitalistic market forces.  This reform will bring back respect and appreciation to moral values rather than market values.  It is a reform project which will enable the ‘West’ to join global forces working together in order to stop the alienation of the underprivileged, and to reinstate intrinsic value to real education.

Now is the right time to launch this initiative to rescue the ‘West’ from the dominance of an atheist minority seeking to destroy all contemporary religious values and moral standards.

Fifth: The ‘West’ must apologize for its repeated assaults on Islam. Furthermore, it must apologize for the numerous crimes that were committed in its name against Muslims during, before, and after the colonial era.

Our message to those who are determined to continue their aggression against our Muslim community is this: The propagation of Islam never ceased when it was attacked at any time in the past nor will it come to an end if it is harassed in this era or until the end of age. The Muslim world has a unique resiliency; a capacity to rebound after setbacks as witnessed throughout history.

The role of our Muslim community will not be limited to defending our religion and what is sacred to us.  It will also extend to expose the tactics of the enemies of humanity. Citizens of the western world will come to recognize that what the enemies of Muslims in the ‘West’ are doing will harm the western world far more than it will harm the Muslim community.

The ‘West’ could possibly lose the advantages of economic trade with 1.25 billion people representing an overwhelming market share of world consumers. It will risk trade relationships with many Muslim countries, which retain a vast wealth of all current natural energy resources needed to fuel the wheel of modernity and development.  These are the same Muslims who carry the largest share of the burden of sustaining human fairness and justice.

We believe that welcoming the western technological advancements, which are beneficial to humanity, does neither indicate nor necessitate trading our own values in order to merge into western cultures. We reject blind adherence to the ‘West’ or anyone else.  At the same time, we do not object to trade and exchange benefits with the ‘West’ or to make use of its technological and industrial innovations.

We call upon the intellectual and opinion leaders in the ‘West’ to truly understand the religion of Islam, and the Muslim community. What motivates us to do so, and our evidence to it, is the divine order in the Book of Allah – The Noble Quran, which we find to be the very best way to conclude our letter to you. The glorious God states: “Say: ‘O people of the Scripture: Come to a word that is just between us and you, that we worship none but God, and that we associate no partners with Him, and that none of us shall take others as lords besides God.’ Then, if they turn away, say: ‘Bear witness that we are Muslims.’” [Quran,3:64]

http://www.islamhouse.com/s/9661

09.21.08

تقرير راند RAND Corporation

Posted in 1, Family, Life, Music, News, Politics, personal, ادب, حوارات ولقاءات, عام, مقالات tagged , , , , , , at 11:22 pm by mhr2

تقرير راند 2007 معلومات خطيرة يجب معرفتها

تقرير راند
الحمدُ للهِ والصلاةُ والسلامُ على رسولِ اللهِ صلى اللهُ عليه وسلم …

قال تعالى : ” وَلَن تَرْضَى عَنكَ الْيَهُودُ وَلاَ النَّصَارَى حَتَّى تَتَّبِعَ مِلَّتَهُمْ ” [ البقرة : 120 ] .

وقال تعالى : ” وَلاَ يَزَالُونَ يُقَاتِلُونَكُمْ حَتَّىَ يَرُدُّوكُمْ عَن دِينِكُمْ إِنِ اسْتَطَاعُواْ ” [ البقرة : 217 ] .

وقال تعالى : ” وَكَذَلِكَ نفَصِّلُ الآيَاتِ وَلِتَسْتَبِينَ سَبِيلُ الْمُجْرِمِينَ ” [ الأنعام : 55 ] .

صدر عن ” مؤسسة راند RAND Corporation ” تقريرها الأخير 2007م ، والذي مكثت مؤسسة راند ثلاث سنوات في إعداده ، وتقاريرها التي تُصدرها ترسم خطةُ للسياسية الإمريكية في التعاملِ مع الأحداث في العالم أجمع ، ومنها منطقة ما يسمونه بـ ” الشرق الأوسط ” ، وقد حمل التقرير الأخير قضايا خطيرة جداً ، وعنون للتقرير ” بناء شبكات مسلمة معتدلة Building Moderate Muslim Networks ” ، وهو عنوان يحملُ في ثناياه خطط خطيرة جداً .

دعوني أضع بين أيديكم ملخصاً جاهزاً للتقرير نشر في عددٍ من المواقع لتعلموا خطورته ، ولتأخذوا حذركم مما نحن مقبلون عليه ، ولنعلم أن هؤلاء القوم يعملون ليلا ونهاراً سراً وعلانيةً لحرب هذا الدين ، ومحاولة زرعِ إسلام جديد بتفاصيل أمريكية أو ” إسلام ليبرالي ” على وزن ” إسلام شيوعي ” .

ولا بد للحكومات أن تَحذرَ وتُحذر من هذا التقرير فهو يحمل في طياتهِ خطراً على العالم الإسلامي من جهةِ دعمه وبقوة لليبراليين ليكونوا أداةً وعملاء لتحقيق ما ورد في التقرير .

ملحوظة مهمة : تذكروا تفاصيل التقرير وأنزلوها على الواقع .
اللهم احفظ علينا ديننا ، وثوابتنا ، وعقيدتنا ، وردّ كيد الخونة والعملاء في نحورهم .

لماذا تبني أمريكا ” شبكات مسلمة معتدلة ” علمانية ؟

محمد جمال عرفة

انقلاب.. هي الكلمة الصحيحة التي يمكن أن نصف بها الموقف الأمريكي – حسبما قدمته مؤسسة “راند” RAND البحثية التابعة للقوات الجوية الأمريكية في تقريرها الأخير “بناء شبكات مسلمة معتدلة” Building Moderate Muslim Networks- بشأن التعامل مع “المسلمين”، وليس “الإسلاميين” فقط مستقبلاً! .

فالتقرير الذي أصدرته هذه المؤسسة البحثية التي تدعمها المؤسسة العسكرية الأمريكية – التي تبلغ ميزانيتها السنوية قرابة 150 مليون دولار – والذي يقع في 217 صفحة لا تنبع خطورته من جراءته في طرح أفكار جديدة للتعامل مع “المسلمين” وتغيير معتقداتهم وثقافتهم من الداخل فقط تحت دعاوى “الاعتدال” بالمفهوم الأمريكي، وإنما يطرح الخبرات السابقة في التعامل مع الشيوعية للاستفادة منها في محاربة الإسلام والمسلمين وإنشاء مسلمين معتدلين !.

بل إن التقرير يحدد بدقة مدهشة صفات هؤلاء “المعتدلين” المطلوب التعاون معهم -بالمواصفات الأمريكية- بأنهم هؤلاء الليبراليين والعلمانيين الموالين للغرب والذين لا يؤمنون بالشريعة الإسلامية ويطرح مقياسًا أمريكيًّا من عشرة نقاط ليحدد بمقتضاه كل شخص هل هو “معتدل” أم لا، ليطرح في النهاية -على الإدارة الأمريكية- خططًا لبناء هذه “الشبكات المعتدلة” التي تؤمن بالإسلام “التقليدي” أو “الصوفي” الذي لا يضر مصالح أمريكا ، خصوصًا في أطراف العالم الإسلامي (آسيا وأوروبا) .

أما ” الانقلاب ” المقصود في بداية هذا المقال فيقصد به أن تقارير “راند” ومؤسسات بحثية أمريكية أخرى عديدة ظلت تتحدث عن مساندة إسلاميين معتدلين في مواجهة المتطرفين، ولكن في تقرير 2007 الأخير تم وضع كل “المسلمين” في سلة واحدة.

إعادة ضبط الإسلام !

الأكثر خطورة في تقرير مؤسسة “راند” الأخير -الذي غالبًا ما تظهر آثار تقاريرها في السياسية الأمريكية مثل “إشعال الصراع بين السنة والشيعة” و”العداء للسعودية” ويتحدث باسم “أمريكا”- أنه يدعو لما يسميه “ضبط الإسلام” نفسه – وليس “الإسلاميين” ليكون متمشيًا مع “الواقع المعاصر”. ويدعو للدخول في بنيته التحتية بهدف تكرار ما فعله الغرب مع التجربة الشيوعية، وبالتالي لم يَعُد يتحدث عن ضبط “الإسلاميين” أو التفريق بين مسلم معتدل ومسلم راديكالي، ولكن وضعهم في سلة واحدة!.

فتقارير “راند” الأخيرة -تقرير 2004- كانت تشجيع إدارة بوش على محاربة “الإسلاميين المتطرفين” عبر: خدمات علمانية (بديلة)، ويدعون لـ”الإسلام المدني”، بمعنى دعم جماعات المجتمع المسلم المدني التي تدافع عن “الاعتدال والحداثة”، وقطع الموارد عن المتطرفين، بمعنى التدخل في عمليتي التمويل وشبكة التمويل، بل وتربية كوادر مسلمة عسكرية علمانية في أمريكا تتفق مصالحها مع مصالح أمريكا للاستعانة بها في أوقات الحاجة.

ولكن في التقرير الحالي ” بناء شبكات مسلمة معتدلة “، يبدو أن الهدف يتعلق بتغيير الإسلام نفسه والمسلمين ككل بعدما ظهر لهم في التجارب السابقة أنه لا فارق بين ” معتدل ” و” متطرف ” وأن الجميع يؤمن بجدوى الشريعة في حياة المسلم، والأمر يتطلب ” اللعب في الفكر والمعتقد ذاتهما ” .

من هو ” المعتدل “.. أمريكيًّا ؟

من يقرأ التقرير سوف يلحظ بوضوح أنه يخلط بشكل مستمر وشبه متعمد ما بين “الإسلاميين” و”الراديكاليين” و”المتطرفين”، ولكنه يطالب بدعم أو خلق تيار “اعتدال” ليبرالي مسلم جديد أو Moderate and liberal Muslims ، ويضع تعريفات محددة لهذا ” الاعتدال الأمريكي ” ، بل وشروط معينة من تنطبق عليه فهو ” معتدل ” – وفقًا للمفهوم الأمريكي للاعتدال، ومن لا تنطبق عليه فهو متطرف.

ووفقًا لما يذكره التقرير، فالتيار (الإسلامي) المعتدل المقصود هو ذلك التيار الذي :

1 – يرى عدم تطبيق الشريعة الإسلامية.

2 – يؤمن بحرية المرأة في اختيار “الرفيق”، وليس الزوج.

3 – يؤمن بحق الأقليات الدينية في تولي المناصب العليا في الدول ذات الغالبية المسلمة.

4 – يدعم التيارات الليبرالية.

5 – يؤمن بتيارين دينيين إسلاميين فقط هما: “التيار الديني التقليدي” أي تيار رجل الشارع الذي يصلي بصورة عادية وليست له اهتمامات أخرى، و”التيار الديني الصوفي” – يصفونه بأنه التيار الذي يقبل الصلاة في القبور (!) – وبشرط أن يعارض كل منها ما يطرحه ” التيار الوهابي “.

ويلاحظ هنا أن التقرير يستشهد بمقولة لدينس روس المبعوث الأمريكي السابق للشرق الأوسط يتحدث فيها عن ضرورة إنشاء ما يسميه (سيكولار – secular – دعوة) أو (دعوة علمانية) ! ، والمقصود هنا هو إنشاء مؤسسات علمانية تقدم نفس الخدمات التطوعية التي تقدمها المنظمات الإسلامية ، سواء كانت قوافل طبية أو كفالة يتيم أو دعم أسري وغيرها.

أما الطريف هنا فهو أن الدراسة تضع 11 سؤالاً لمعرفة ما هو تعريف (المعتدل) – من وجهة النظر الأمريكية – وتكون بمثابة اختبار يعطي للشخص المعرفة إذا كان معتدلاً أم لا ؟. وهذه المعايير هي :

1 – أن الديمقراطية هي المضمون الغربي للديمقراطية.

2 – أنها تعني معارضة “مبادئ دولة إسلامية”.

3 – أن الخط الفاصل بين المسلم المعتدل والمسلم المتطرف هو تطبيق الشريعة.

4 – أن المعتدل هو من يفسر واقع المرأة على أنه الواقع المعاصر، وليس ما كان عليه وضعها في عهد الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم.

5 – هل تدعم وتوافق على العنف؟ وهل دعمته في حياتك من قبل أو وافقت عليه؟.

6 – هل توافق على الديمقراطية بمعناها الواسع.. أي حقوق الإنسان الغربية (بما فيها الشذوذ وغيره)؟.

7 – هل لديك أي استثناءات على هذه الديمقراطية (مثل حرية الفرد في تغيير دينه)؟

8 – هل تؤمن بحق الإنسان في تغيير دينه؟.

9 – هل تعتقد أن الدولة يجب أن تطبق الجانب الجنائي من الشريعة؟ وهل توافق على تطبيق الشريعة في جانبها المدني فقط (الأخلاق وغيره)؟، هل توافق على أن الشريعة يمكن أن تقبل تحت غطاء علماني (أي القبول بتشريعات أخرى من غير الشريعة)؟.

10- هل تعتقد أنه يمكن للأقليات أن تتولى المناصب العليا ؟ وهل يمكن لغير المسلم أن يبني بحرية معابده في الدول الإسلامية ؟.

وبحسب الإجابة على هذه الأسئلة سوف يتم تصنيفه هل هو معتدل ( أمريكيًّا ) أم متطرف ؟!

ويذكر التقرير ثلاثة أنواع ممن يسميهم (المعتدلين) في العالم الإسلامي، وهم :

(أولاً) : العلماني الليبرالي الذي لا يؤمن بدور للدين.

(ثانيًا) : “أعداء المشايخ”.. ويقصد بهم هنا من يسميهم التقرير ” الأتاتوركيين ” – أنصار العلمانية التركية – وبعض ” التونسيين ” .

(ثالثًا) : الإسلاميون الذين لا يرون مشكلة في تعارض الديمقراطية الغربية مع الإسلام.
ثم يقول بوضوح إن التيار المعتدل هم من : يزورون الأضرحة، والمتصوفون ومن لا يجتهدون .

الأطراف.. بدل المركز العربي للإسلام

وينفق التقرير جزءًا كبيرًا منه (فصلان من عشرة فصول) في التركيز على ضرورة أن يتم التركيز على “أطراف” العالم الإسلامي وتجاهل “المركز” -يقصد به المنطقة العربية- بغرض دعم ما يسمونه ” الاعتدال في أطراف العالم الإسلامي ” خصوصًا في آسيا وأوروبا وغيرها.

أما الهدف فهو أن تخرج الأفكار الإسلامية المؤثرة على مجمل العالم الإسلامي من هذه الأطراف وليس من المركز (العربي) الذي أصبح ينتشر فيه “التطرف”، وبحيث تصبح هذه الأطراف هي المصدرة للفكر الإسلامي المعتدل الجديد، ولا تخرج الأفكار من المركز!.

بل إن التقرير يطرح هنا طريقة غريبة في الحوار مع المسلمين بهدف تغييرهم تتلخص في: تغيير من نحاوره، وتحجيمه عن القيام بأعماله، أو “انتظار الفرصة المناسبة” بدون أن يحدد ما يعني بالفرصة المناسبة .

وهنا يركز في فصليه السادس والسابع على تجربة الأطراف في آسيا وأوروبا على التوالي، ويطرح أسماء مؤسسات وأشخاص في آسيا وأوروبا “ينبغي” العمل معها ودعمها بالمال، ويضرب أمثلة بتجارب مشوّهة تشوِّه دور الإسلام بالفعل مطلوب التعاون معها ودعمها، مثل دعم موقع سعودي يرى مثلاً أن الأحاديث حول شهادة (ألا إله إلا الله.. وأن محمدًا رسول الله) ليست ثابتة ! .

احذروا دور المسجد

والغريب أن التقرير يركز في فصله الأول (المقدمة) على ما يعتبره ” خطورة دور المسجد ” – ضمن هجومه على التيار الإسلامي – باعتبار أنه (المسجد) الساحة الوحيدة للمعارضة على أسس الشريعة ؛ ولذلك يدعو لدعم ” الدعاة الذين يعملون من خارج المسجد ” (!) ، ولا ينسى أن يحذر من سطوة المال – يقصد به المال السعودي الوهابي – الذي يدعم تنظيم التيار الإسلامي، مؤكدًا أنه لا بد من تقليل تقدم هذا التيار الديني لصالح التيار العلماني التقليدي الديني ( وفق المفهوم الأمريكي للاعتدال ) ، بغرض ” تسوية الملعب ” كي يتقدم ” التيار التقليدي” ! .

بعبارة أخرى يركز التقرير هنا على أن الطريق الصحيح لمحاربة المسلمين هو بناء أرضية من المسلمين أنفسهم من أعداء التيار الإسلامي، مثلما حدث في أوروبا الشرقية وروسيا حينما تم بناء منظمات معادية للشيوعية من أبناء الدول الشيوعية نفسها.

وربما لهذا أفرد التقرير فصله الثاني للتركيز على فكرة الحرب البادرة والاستفادة من الخبرة الأمريكية في ضرب التيار الشيوعي من الداخل في تقديم نموذج مشابه لصانع القرار الأمريكي كي يستفيد منها في المواجهة المشابهة مع التيار الإسلامي، وركّز هنا على جانبين :

(الأول) خاص بخبرة الاستعانة بالطابور الخامس من المهاجرين البولنديين والشيوعيين للغرب ومعهم المفكرين الأمريكيين لتمهيد أرض المعركة ونشر القيم الغربية .

و(الثاني) خاص بالجانب الإعلامي مثل تجربة (راديو ليبرتي) الموجه لروسيا، فضلاً عن إنشاء قسم خاص في المخابرات الأمريكية دوره هو التغيير الفكري لمواقف وآراء طلاب ومفكري الدول الشيوعية وتقديم العالم لهم من وجهة نظر غربية محببة. بل يطرح التقرير هنا أفكارًا بشأن كيفية استخدام الدين ضد الشيوعية، كنوع من الإسقاط لبيان أنه يمكن -العكس- باستخدام العلمانية ضد الدين في الدول الإسلامية ! .
ومع أن الفصل الثالث من دراسة (راند) يركز على بحث أوجه التشابه أو الخلاف بين أسلحة الحرب البادرة في هدم الشيوعية، وأسلحة الحرب الحالية ضد الفكر الإسلامي، ويؤكد أن هناك أوجه تشابه أبرزها أن الصراع مع الشيوعية كان فكريًّا مثلما هو الحال مع العالم الإسلامي، فهو يعترف بأن عقبات هذه السياسة أعمق مع المسلمين.

ويذكر من أوجه الخلاف -عما حدث في الحرب البادرة- بأن أهداف الشيوعية كانت واضحة للغرب وكان من السهل محاربتها، بعكس أهداف التيار الإسلامي غير الواضحة للغرب، كما أن الشيوعية كانت هناك آليات للتفاوض معها (عبر أجهزة الأمم المتحدة وغيرها) ، بعكس التيار الإسلامي غير المحدد في كتلة واحدة محددة كالشيوعية، أما الأهم فهو المخاوف – كما يعترف التقرير – من أن ينظر لمحاولات ” تحرير” العالم الاسلامي أو اعتداله على الطريقة الغربية على أنه غزو واحتلال فكري ، فضلاً عن صعوبة ضرب وتحجيم الدول التي تقف خلف الفكر الوهابي (السعودية) ؛ لأنها في نفس الوقت دول ترتبط أمريكا بمصالح معها (البترول – مناطق النفوذ) .

مرحبًا بالدول المتسلطة لا للديمقراطية

وربما لهذا يقول التقرير صراحة إن هناك مشكلة أمريكية في الضغط على حكومات وأنظمة الدول العربية والإسلامية المتسلطة للحصول على الديمقراطية، ما يعني ضمنًا التوقف عن دعم برامج الديمقراطية في العالم العربي والإسلامي والتوقف عن الضغط للمجيء بالديمقراطية.

ويقول – في مقدمة الفصل الخامس – إن أمريكا دعمت في أوقات سابقة ما اعتبرته قوى معتدلة إسلامية في الأردن والمغرب (حزب العدالة والتنمية) و” فوجئنا أننا أخطأنا وأننا دعمنا غير المعتدلين ” ! ، كما لا ينسى أن يشير لمشكلة في التأثير – بالمعونة الأمريكية – على التيار الإسلامي في دول غنية مثل دول الخليج ( مثلما يحدث في دول فقيرة ) ، ومن ثَم صعوبة ضرب التيار الإسلامي الحقيقي في هذه الدول الإسلامية الغنية.

والملفت هنا أن التقرير يسرد قائمة بمن يعتبرهم من المعتدلين في العديد من الدول العربية ودول الخليج ، ما يعني حرقهم أو ربما قطع خط الرجعة عليهم للعودة عن العمالة لأمريكا، ويطرح أفكارًا لمواجهة اتهام أنصاره بالعمالة، ويؤكد أهمية برامج التلفزيون التي تركز على فكرة (التعايش) مع الغرب.

الدراسة أو التقرير خطيرة كما هو واضح ومليئة بالأفكار السامة التي تركز على ما يسمونه ” علمنة الإسلام ” ، ومناصرة العلمانيين ودعمهم في المرحلة المقبلة، ويصعب جمع ما فيها في تقرير واحد، ولكن الأمر المؤكد أن الدراسة تركز – كما يقول مؤلفها الرئيسي في حوار صحفي – على أن ” الهدف ليس طرح الصراع بين العالم الإسلامي والغرب ، وإنما بين العالم الإسلامي بعضه بعضًا “… أي ضرب الإسلام والمسلمين من الداخل على غرار تجربة ضرب الشيوعية .

09.18.08

ملاحقة المتطاولين على اللحيدان

Posted in 1, Family, Life, Music, News, Politics, personal, ادب, حوارات ولقاءات, عام, مقالات tagged , , at 4:09 pm by mhr2

لـُجينيات / في خبر عاجل  ونقلا عن أحد المسؤولين فإنه سيتم رصد كل من تطاول على سماحة العلامة الشيخ صالح اللحيدان رئيس مجلس القضاء الأعلى بشكل شخصي وملاحقته قانونيا تحت بند مكافحة الجرائم المعلوماتية  , حيث نصت المادة الثالثة , رقم 5 على  :

التشهير بالآخرين , وإلحاق الضرر بهم , عبر وسائل تقنيات المعلومات المختلفة .

ونص النظام على أن عقوبة هذه المخالفة  السجن مدة لاتزيد على سنة وغرامة لاتزيد على خمسمائة ألف ريال , أو إحدى هاتين العقوبتين .

كما نصت المادة التاسعة على استحقاق المحرض والمساعد والمتفق مع أي فرد يقع في شيء من المخالفات التي نص عليها النظام بنفس العقوبة .

وإن غدا لناظره قريب  .

لجينيات

الشيخ نصر واصل يؤيد اللحيدان ويدعو لمعاقبة محرفي الفتاوى

Posted in Family, Life, Music, News, Politics, personal, ادب, حوارات ولقاءات, عام, مقالات tagged , , , , , , , , at 3:58 pm by mhr2

نصر واصل يؤيد اللحيدان ويدعو لمعاقبة محرفي الفتاوى
الإسلام اليوم/ صحف
17/9/1429 11:51 م 17/09/2008

أكد فضيلة الشيخ الدكتور نصر فريد واصل (مفتي مصر السابق) أن فتوى الشيخ صالح اللحيدان، (رئيس مجلس القضاء الأعلى بالسعودية) صحيحة، مشدِّدًا على أن من يدعو إلى الفتن إذا قُدر على منعه ولم يمتنع قد يحلّ قتله؛ لأن دعاة الفساد في الاعتقاد أو العمل إذا لم يندفع شرّهم بعقوبات دون القتل جاز قتلهم بعد إخضاعهم للقضاء.
وقال واصل في حوار له بجريدة “الجمهورية” الحكومية بمصر: لابد أن أقف على ما قاله الشيخ اللحيدان أولاً، خاصة وأنه عالم معروف بعلمه وعطائه، كما أنه رئيس مجلس القضاء الأعلى، أي أنه قاضٍ، ولن يفتيَ إلا بعد أن يكون قد محَّص الفتوى، كما أنني باعتباري من علماء الأزهر ومفتٍ سابق، لا يجوز لي أن أُعلّق على رأي عالم ما إلا إذا وقفْتُ على كل ما قال.
وأضاف أن الفتوى كما نُقلت عنه في رده على أحد مستمعي الإذاعة، الذي سأله عن الموقف من مُلاك الفضائيات التي تثير الفتنة عبر برامجها غير اللائقة، قال فيها بالنص: “إن من يدعو إلى الفتن إذا قُدر على منعه ولم يمتنع قد يحلُّ قتلُه؛ لأن دعاة الفساد في الاعتقاد أو العمل إذا لم يندفع شرّهم بعقوبات دون القتل جاز قتلهم بعد إخضاعهم للقضاء”.
وتابع فضيلته يقول: إذن الرجل يتحدث عن القضاء والمحاكمة، ويقول قد يحلّ قتلهم، أي أنه يقصد أنه إذا ثبت على مُلاك الفضائية أو غيرهم أنهم مفسدون في الأرض -وذلك من خلال قنوات قضائية، وإجراءات تتمثل في نصحهم أولاً إلى آخر الخطوات الشرعية في زجر المفسد ومحاولة إعادته إلى جادة الصواب- فإن على وليِّ الأمر -أي القاضي هنا- أن يعزِّره بعقوبة قد تصل إلى القتل، وقد يحكم عليه إذا تبين له ذلك بأنه من المفسدين في الأرض، ويحاكمه بعقوبات المفسدين.
ونفى فضيلة الدكتور واصل أن تكون مثل هذه الفتوى تضرّ بالإسلام وبصورته لدى الآخرين، الذين يعتبرونه دينًا يحجر على حرية الرأي، وقال: الإسلام مسئول عن تنظيم الدنيا، أي أن به قانونًا يجب على الملتزم به أن يطبّقه، ومادام يتضمن في قانونه أن من يفسد في الأرض ويتسبب في إفساد الناس له عقوبة معينة، فليس لأحد أن يعترض على ذلك؛ مادام قد رضي بهذا الدين. ومضى فضيلته يستطرد متعجبًا: أنا أتساءل بدوري، إذا كان الذين يعتبرون أن تنفيذ الأحكام الشرعية بما يحمي أمن الوطن الذي يدين بالإسلام قد يضر بصورة الإسلام، فلماذا لا تعتبر أوروبا والغرب أن الزواج المثلي -أي زواج الشواذ- يضر بصورة الغرب لدى الآخرين؟ ولماذا لا يكون هناك احترام للقيم والمبادئ لكل حضارة وقيم. إن ديننا يأمرنا أن نحاسب من يفسد في الأرض بعقاب معيّن، فما العيب إذا طبقنا أمر ديننا مادمنا نؤسّس أحكامنا على قاعدة صحيحة؟.. ولماذا تهاجَم الآن القنوات التي تنشر الفكر الديني هجومًا شرسًا ولا يتكلم أحد؟ فإذا ما هوجمت قنوات العُري والفساد، من خلال أحكام يتضمنها قانون ويعرفها الجميع، أصبحت صورة الإسلام مشوهة كما يقولون! ألَا يعرف الجميع أن هناك تمويلًا مرصودًا من جهات خارجية لإفساد المجتمعات الإسلامية، وصرفها عن ثقافاتها؟؟. والمتتبع لما يبثّ من مواد درامية يجدها تطبيقًا لما هو مطلوب في إطار أسماء برّاقة، ومنظمات دولية لا نعرف لصالح مَنْ تعمل. كذلك محاولات تشويه صورة الإسلام في الإعلام الغربي هي محاولات قائمة، سواء صدرت فتوى هنا أو هناك، أو لم يصدر.
وحول طريقة التعامل مع من يحرّفون كلام العلماء قال فضيلة مفتي مصر السابق: للأسف! فإن كل ما يتعلق بالدين لا يهتم به أحد، أما إذا كان الكلام في حق مسئول -ولو كان بسيطًا- قامت الدنيا ولم تقعد، وعُوقب المتحدث إذا ثبت خطؤه، أما الكلام في حق الله ودينه فلا يُعِيرُه أحد اهتمامًا، حتى ولو أفسد على الناس حياتهم ودينهم، رغم أنه يجب أن يعامَل المحرِّف لكلام العلماء قاصدًا، نفس معاملة من يفشي أسرارًا عسكرية؛ لأنه يضر بأمن الوطن والمواطن، لذا أطالب بتشريعٍ خاص يحمي العلماء من تحريف غير العلماء أو من يأخذون عنهم، فإذا عرف المحرّف أو المجتزئ أن عقابًا ينتظره لم يكتب إلا الصدق، ولم يكتب إلا ما هو متأكد منه؛ لأن كلمة واحدة قد توقع حربًا وفتنًا، والله تعالى يقول: «وَاتَّقُوا فِتْنَةً لَا تُصِيبَنَّ الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا مِنْكُمْ خَاصَّةً»[الأنفال:25].

09.17.08

Advice to the Students of Knowledge

Posted in 1, Family, Life, News, Politics, personal, ادب, حوارات ولقاءات, خواطر وشعر, عام, مقالات tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , at 2:15 am by mhr2

In the Name of Allâh, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful

Advice to the Students of Knowledge

Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Saleh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen

Finally, I sincerely advise, myself first, and my Muslim brothers, especially the students of knowledge not to make haste and be quick when a new issue befalls a person until he verifies the situation, gains knowledge and then speaks, so that he does not speak about Allah without knowledge.

As, the person who gives judgment is an emissary between the people and Allah; he conveys the Shari’ah of Allah as has been reported from the Messenger of Allah (Sallallahu `alaihi wa sallam):

“The scholars are the inheritors of the Prophets” (Ahmad (5/196). Aboo Dawood, at-Tirmidhi and others);

and the Prophet (sallallahu `alaihi wa sallam) has also said:

“The judges are three: (only) one of the judges being in paradise and he is the one who knew the truth and judged according to it.”

Related by Abu Dawood with the following wording:

“The judges are three; one of the judges is in Paradise and two are in the Fire. With regards to the one in Paradise then he is the man who knew the truth and judged according to it. The man who knew the truth and was unjust in his ruling is in the Fire, and the man who judged between the people out of ignorance is in the Fire.”

Also of importance, when a new issue befalls you, draw your heart towards Allah and feel in need of Him so that he causes you to understand and imparts knowledge to you; especially in grave and important matters, where many people remain in ignorance.

Some of my teachers mentioned to me that it is befitting for the person who has been questioned on an issue, to seek forgiveness from Allah even more; deducing that from Allah’s statement,

{{Surely, we have revealed to you the Book in truth that you may judge between the people by that which Allah has shown you; so do not be a pleader for the treacherous. And seek the forgiveness of Allah, certainly, Allah is ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.}} (Surah an-Nisaa’ (4):105-106)

An increase in seeking forgiveness necessitates the wiping away of the repercussions of sins, which is one of the causes of forgetting knowledge and becoming ignorant, as Allah says,

{{So, because of their breach of their covenant. We cursed them and made their hearts grow hard. They change the words from their proper places and forgot a good part of the message that was sent to them.}} (Surah al-Maa’idah (5):13)

Imam ash-Shaafi`ee once said: I complained to Wakee` (*) about my poor memory. So he advised me to abandon disobedience. and he said, ‘know that knowledge is light. And the light of Allah is not bestowed upon a disobedient.

So it is certainly possible that seeking forgiveness causes Allah to give a person enlightenment.

I ask Allah to grant me success, make me upright that He keeps us firm with the Firm Word (Shahaadah) in this life and the Hereafter; and that He does not cause our hearts to deviate after having guided us and to grant us from His self, mercy: Indeed, He is the Benevolent. All praise is for Allah alone, and may He praise, send peace and blessings upon our Prophet Muhammad and his Companions.

* Wakee’ Ibn al-Jarraah was a famous scholar from the Salaf and one of the teachers of Imam ash-Shaafi`ee. He died in the year 196H.

http://www.islamhouse.com/p/144913

09.14.08

الشيخ اللحيدان يرد على من حرف فتواه حول جواز قتل ملاك الفضائيات

Posted in 1, Family, Music, News, Politics, ادب, حوارات ولقاءات, عام, مقالات tagged , , , , , , , , at 6:04 pm by mhr2

الشيخ اللحيدان يرد على من حرف فتواه حول جواز قتل ملاك الفضائيات

الشيخ اللحيدان يرد على من حرف فتواه حول جواز قتل ملاك الفضائيات

في لقاء خاص بثه التلفزيون السعودي صباح اليوم
الشيخ اللحيدان يشرح فتواه حول ملاك الفضائيات

صالح اللحيدان
الرياض: عضوان الأحمري، واس

بث التلفزيون السعودي في تمام الساعة الثالثة والنصف من صباح اليوم لقاء خاصا مع رئيس مجلس القضاء الأعلى، عضو هيئة كبار العلماء الشيخ صالح بن محمد اللحيدان، شرح فيه الشيخ اللحيدان فتواه حول جواز قتل ملاك الفضائيات قضاءً، وهي الفتوى التي أثارت جدلا واسعا في اليومين الماضين، وفيما يلي نص الحلقة التي قدمها الدكتور سليمان العيدي:
المذيع العيدي: يتناقل الناس فتوى سماحتكم التي سئلتم فيها في البرنامج الإذاعي “نور على الدرب” والمتعلقة بما تبثه الفضائيات خلال شهر رمضان المبارك وقد حرفت هذه الفتوى وتناقلتها الأوساط المغرضة عن وجهتها وعن ما تفضل به سماحتكم وعن ما أدلى به سماحتكم للإذاعة.
س/ الفتن الكبيرة التي يجلبها أصحاب القنوات الفضائية وعلى وجه الخصوص في شهر رمضان المبارك وتركز برامجها السيئة على فترتي المغرب والعشاء على المسلمين فما هي نصيحتكم للمشاهد وما هي أيضا نصيحتكم لأصحاب القنوات.
الشيخ اللحيدان: بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم والحمد الله رب العالمين والصلاة والسلام على سيد الأولين والآخرين نبينا محمد وعلى آله وصحابته والتابعين لهم بإحسان إلى يوم الدين وبعد: سئلت هذا السؤال وقبل الدخول في إيضاح ما كانت الإجابة به أحب أن أتحدث عن نفسي وإن كنت لا أحب الحديث عن النفس ولا أحرص على المظاهر الإعلامية ولا الكتابات الصحفية رغبة في الانشغال بغير ذلك ومع هذا فعندما تدعو حاجة إلى ما عليه الإنسان يكون مثل ذلك من باب المصلحة العامة وما نشر في الفضائيات والقنوات والمغرضين كأنهم معنيون بتاريخ حياتي، وذكروا بدئي في القضاء بعد أن كنت في الإفتاء، وأنا كما يعلم العارفين بي وليعلم من لم يكن لم يعرف أنا من المتخرجين من كلية الشريعة عام 1379هـ ، وفي أوائل سنة 80 تعينت مع سماحة مفتي عام المملكة العربية السعودية سماحة الشيخ محمد بن إبراهيم رحمة الله عليه سكرتيرا له في الإفتاء وبقيت معه، وكنت والحمد لله والمنة والفضل له كنت محل الثقة وتقديرهم واحترام رأيهم ، وفي عام 83 نقلني رحمة الله عليه إلى محكمة الرياض ليهيئني لرئاستها وذلك في أول رجب عام 83 وجلست فيها، وفي أوائل عام 84 توليت رئاسة المحكمة وبقيت فيها إلى 5 محرم عام91 ثم انتقلت إلى الهيئة القضائية العليا وتحولت فيما بعد إلى مجلس القضاء الأعلى وبقيت في هذا العمل في حياتي القضائية في الإفتاء وفي القضاء لمدة تتجاوز 50 عاما، كل هذا العمل في أعمال هامة”.
وتابع الشيخ اللحيدان “فيما يتعلق بالتحصيل العلمي تخرجت من الشريعة وقرأت قراءة وشرحا وتعليقا مؤطأ الإمام مالك في المسجد على الجماعة وصحيي البخاري ومسلم وسنن الترمذي وأبي داود والنسائي طيلة هذه السنين التي مضت ، وترتيب مسند الإمام أحمد بن عبد الرحمن البنا الساعاتي، كل هذه الكتب العظيمة الهامة قرأتها على الناس في المسجد إماما وتكلمت عن معانيها مع ما يحتاجه القضاء من مراجعة لكتب الفقه والأصول والقواعد الفقهية، وفي حياتي لم أكن أتمتع في إجازة طيلة حياتي الماضية إلا بشهر واحد كما لم أكن أتمتع بإجازات خاصة، ومن فضل الله علي وعلى العمل أنني لم أتغيب عن العمل لمرض إلا مرتين في أمر خفيف والحمد الله على منه وكرمه وجوده، ولقد تعاملت مع العلماء الذين هم كبار علماء المملكة ومن يتصل بهم ، فكنت والحمد لله محل تقدير العلماء وعلى رأسهم الشيخ محمد بن إبراهيم ويليه تلامذته ومن في طبقتهم الشيخ عبد الرزاق عفيفي وأستاذنا الشيخ عبدالعزيز بن باز والشيخ عبدالله بن حميد وتلك الطبقة وكنت عضوا في هيئة كبار العلماء من أول عام 1391هـ ولا أزال فيها، وفيما يتعلق مع الملوك تملك المملكة بعد الملك عبدالعزيز رحمة الله عليه الملك سعود وكان الملك عبدالعزيز يوم وفاته وأنا في الثالثة والعشرين عاما “رجل” لكن التعامل مع الملك سعود كان محدودا قليلا بعدها كنت مسؤولا في العمل في القضاء ثم مع الملك فيصل والملك خالد والملك فهد رحمة الله عليهم أجمعين ومع الملك عبدالله وسمو ولي عهده وكبار المسؤولين في الدولة من أصحاب السمو الملكي وأصحاب المعالي الوزراء الذين لهم صلة بي ولي بهم صلة”.
وأضاف الشيخ اللحيدان “كنت في كل ذلك والحمد لله أتمتع بحسن الصلة والتقدير منهم. هذه بالنسبة لي للحياة، بالنسبة للمشاكل في عام 85 لا تعرض قضية هامة تمس أمن الدولة وتضايق المواطنين والمجتمع إلا وفي الغالب أنا داخل فيها قضاء ودراسة بعد القضاء وأمثال ذلك، فهذه الحياة لا تدل على أن الإنسان يتكلم في فتوى عن جهل أو عدم روية أو إدراك”.
واستطرد الشيخ اللحيدان قائلا “وأما الفتيا فأنا من عام 80 مكلف بالفتيا في الحرم في الحج ، ففي عام 80 كلفني الشيخ محمد بن إبراهيم رحمة الله عليه و 20 رجلا من الزملاء أهل العلم ندرس في الحرم موسم الحج بكامله و بقيت في الفتيا بالنسبة لمناسك الحج طيلة هذه المدة مشاركا ومن عام 1404هـ كلفت بدروس الحرم في رمضان وما بعده والحج وإن كنت تخلفت أنا عن المواصلة في الحج للانشغال والازدحام وفي الدروس الصيفية عدة سنوات فكنت والحمد لله محل رضى المستمعين وأهل العلم ومن يتصل بي من داخل المملكة وخارجها وهذا فضل الله جل وعلا واحتمال قادح لا يستغرب تأثر شيخ الإسلام بن تيمية، كما كثر المعترضون عليه، أنشد أبياتا أذكر واحد منها يعرفها المتعاطون للأدب يقول فيها:
لو لم تكن لي في القلوب مهابة …. لم تكثر الأعداء في تقديحي
فلا ألوم من يتضايق من أن يكون إنسان موفق لأي عمل من الأعمال وإذا صار الشنآن والازدراء ممن هم دون المستوى فأستشهد إشارة أنه تُكلم في أهل العلم وانتُقد الرسل من قبلهم وأما من جانب الأدب فيقول أبو الطيب المتنبي في قصيدته مطلعها: لك في القلوب منازل…
وإذا أتتك مذمتي من ناقص….. فهي الشهادة لي بأني كامل.
فإذا جاءت المذمة من نقص في عقله أو إيمانه فهذا لا يضير يكفيني ما يقول الشاعر الأول:
إذا رضيت عني كرام عشيرتي…… فلا زال غضبانا علي لئامها
فأنا إذا كنت أتمتع فيما أظن برضى الله جل وعلا ثم برضى ملوك بلادي وكبار رجالهم من إخوانهم ونوابهم فلا أبالي فيمن دونهم إلا أنني أحب لكل مسلم أن يوفقه للصواب في أموره كلها وأن يهديه سواء السبيل ، وأنا ما أقول لمن يسيئني إلا حسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل. هذا مجمل خلاصة احببت ان اقولها في بداية الحديث.
وتابع الشيخ اللحيدان “وأما ما يتعلق بالسؤال الذي سمعت نصه الآن من الدكتور سليمان بارك الله فيه وأسرني أنه هو الذي حضر لإيراد ما سمعت هذا السؤال كان تسجيله فيما يظهر أنه في شوال 6 لهذا العام أو في أواخر شهر 5 في الرياض فأجبت عليه إجابة من ينفع المستمعين بداية بمن يكونون معنيين في السؤال وهم أصحاب البث في القنوات الفضائية ومن يستمع لهم لأن الخطاب الذي يراد به أن يكون نافعا يوجه لأكبر عدد ممكن رجاء أن ينفع الله به وقد قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم “رب مبلغ أوعى من سامع” قد ينقل الواحد ما سمعه لغيره ولا يكون وهو ينقله فاهم أبعاد ما نقل فينقله لمن هو أفقه منه وأكثر إيضاحا لمراميه وهذا ما كنت أرجو وأهدف له حين أبديت ما أبديت وما كنت أظن أن أحدا سيكون جريئا على التجريح والتشويش وقطع الكلام من مبدئه أومن منتهاه أو من وسطه لحاجة في نفسه ما كنت أتوقع هذا لأنني لا أسعى لغيظ أحد ولا للإساءة إلى أحد ، بل يسرني كثيرا أن يصل إحساني باللسان أو بالشفاعة أو نحو ذلك بالنصح والإرشاد إلى أكبر عدد ممكن وأنا إن لم أكن مفتيا أتلقى الفتاوى عبر الهاتف وفي مقري في العمل وفي منزلي وفي الدروس التي ألقيها والمحاضرات التي يلَّح علي فيها، وأنا وقتي كما يعرف كل من يعرف أنني في القضاء وفي دراسة القضايا ـ القتل والرجم والأموال والتعزيرات والحدود وغير ذلك ـ يستدعي من الواحد أن يكون باذلا جل ما يمكنه أن يبذله من وقته في خدمة هذا الجهاز الذي أعتبره ولله الحمد أميز قضاء في العالم وإن لم يرضي المغرضون لأن هذا القضاء إنما يعتمد على مفهوم من كتاب الله جل وعلا ومن سنة نبيه صلى الله عليه وسلم ومن أقوال الصحابة رضي الله عنهم أجمعين ومما أجمع عليه سلف الأمة من عهد القرون الثلاثة التي شهد النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم بأنها خير القرون كما في حديث عمران بن الحصين وعبدالله بن مسعود المخرجين في الصحيح حيث قال “خير القرون الذي بعثت فيهم” وهؤلاء الصحابة ثم الذين يلونهم وهؤلاء أتباع التابعين الذين لم ينقرضوا إلا في حدود منتصف المائة الثانية من الهجرة، وما جاء بعدهم من أهل العلم فهو إنما هو تفريع واستنباط وإيضاح ما فهموه من كلام أولئك أو ما نقلوه فالحمد لله على كل حال ثم أني تكلمت عن هذه المحطات ولا شك أنني لست راضيا عن كثير من القنوات الفضائية وإن كنت ألقيت كلمات في قنواتنا وفي قناة المجد.
أما تسجيلات التلفاز فأنا من تأسيس التلفاز في المملكة وأنا ألقي فيه في بعض السنوات حلقات رمضان التفسيرية كلها كنت أتولى ذلك، أتذكر في بداية الملك خالد أو في أوائل الملك فهد ثم بعد كثر الشغل عندي فكنت لا أستطيع أن أسجل.
في هذه الحلقة التي أثارت واستثارت من حرف فيها ولم ينقل الكلام الذي قلته نصا أنا بدأتها بالنصح لأصحاب القنوات بأن يتقوا الله ويخافوه وأن لا يسعوا لبث شيء مما يفسد عقائد الناس كما يتعلق بالسحر وأنواعه وتمثيليات فيها شركيات ظاهرة وما يتعلق بنشر الخلاعة والمجون وما يتعلق بالمضحكات التي لا تليق برمضان واستهزاء برجالات علم أو رجالات أمر بمعروف و نهي عن المنكر أو غير ذلك مما لا يليق ببسيط الناس أن يتعناها، فكيف بمحطات تبث على الهواء فنصحت هؤلاء بأن عليهم أن يتقوا الله ولا يسعوا لإفساد الناس وأن من قلدهم أو تأثر بفسادهم و تضرر باعتناق بعض الأفكار التي يسلكونها أنه يتحمل وزره لكنهم يتحملون مثل أوزاره لأن من دعا إلى سنة سيئة تحمل وزر دعوته وتحمل أمثال أوزار من يتبعونه عليها فكنت في كلامي أنصح لأصحاب تلك القنوات أن يتقوا الله في الأمة الإسلامية ألا يسعوا لبث ما يشوه أخلاقها أو يدعوها للتساهل في أمر دينها أو يجرؤها على الخلط في أمر العقائد بالسفاهة والسحر والشعوذة وغير ذلك.
وأن هؤلاء المسؤولين والباثين إذا لم يمتنعوا ومنعتهم السلطة ولم يمتنعوا وتمادوا في ذلك أنهم يعاقبون ومن لم يردعه العقاب واستمر على إفساد الناس فيما يبث أنه يجوز للسلطة قتلهم وأنا قلت قضاءً، ومعلوم أن القاضي لا يخرج بسيفه ويقتل من يقتل وإنما تقام الدعوى من الجهات المخصصة للادعاء لهيئة الادعاء العام و يسمع القاضي ويصدر أحكامه إذا ظهر له أن المدعى عليه ممن يستحقون العقوبة القاسية، ثم يرفع هذا للجهات المختصة في تدقيق الأحكام ثم يرفع بعد ذلك للجهة التي هي أعلى منها فإن مراحل القضاء في المملكة ليست درجة واحدة، الدرجة الأولى تأتي الثانية إذا اقتضت الحال منها الاحتياط للقضاء والاحتياط للأحكام التي تصدر أو إذا لم يرضى المحكوم عليه ترفع إلى جهة تدقق وهيئة تدقق الأحكام والقضايا الكبار التي تصل إلى القتل أو في ما حكمه ترفع إلى هيئة أخرى أعلى من الهيئات تلك لتدرس، وكل ذلك على منهاج الكتاب والسنة وما أجمع عليه علماء الأمة فهذه الفتوى التي تعرضت لأمر السحر والشعوذة وأمر العقيدة وأمر الأخلاق والنهي وأشرت إلى الاستدلال بالآيات الكريمة التي فيها إشارة إلى أن “من قتل نفس بغير نفس أو فساد في الأرض فكأنما قتل الناس جميعا” فأشرت إلى ذلك إشارة لم أكن أتوقع أن الأمر سيؤول بعد أربعة أشهر أو حولها إلى تناقل قنوات الفضاء أو ربما محطات أجنبية أو يتلقفه أناس من داخل المملكة لا يسمعون كامل الجواب فيظنون رئيس مجلس القضاء الأعلى وعضو هيئة كبار العلماء الذي أمضى فيها قرابة أربعين سنة في هيئة كبار العلماء راح من راح و لازلت والحمد لله باقيا بل إن التشكيلة الأولى لهيئة كبار العلماء لم يبق منهم على قيد الحياة إلا أنا الآن، فإن تشكيلهم الأول في حياة الشيخ محمد بن إبراهيم كانوا من 14 نفرا كنت أحدهم ولم يبقَ منهم إلا سواي وأنا في الطريق كما يقول الشاعر العربي:
وأراني طرادة في أثرهم طرد أنوار….إلخ ، فهذه سنة الله في الأشياء لا يتوقع من عاش هذه المدة في هذه الحياة العملية وعايش هذه المراحل العملية وآخى وزامن وعاش تحت رئاسة كبار العلماء في هذه البلاد لا يتوقع أن يكون متسرعا كالتسرع الذي حرفوا أو قلبوا وقال أنه حكم على ملاك الفضائيات بالقتل لكني لا أقول إلا أسأل الله أن يهدي المغرضين سواء السبيل وأن يصلح أفهامهم جميعا وأن يثبتنا جميعا بالقول الثابت في الحياة الدنيا ويوم يقوم العباد كما أسأل الله سبحانه وتعالى لهذه المملكة بالخصوص أن يزيدها الله ثباتا على الهدى وحسن التمسك به وصلابة في الوقوف في وجه المغرضين لإعزاز أمر هذا الدين فإن هذه البلاد ما عاشت هذه المدة وحصلت تلك التقلبات على الدول المجاورة من ثورات واضطرابات وتردد وبقيت هذه الدولة بحمد الله ثابتة سائرة على المنهج التي هي عليه إلا لأنها ولله الحمد على الحق ولم تكن على الباطل وتلتمس رضا الله وقد قال المصطفى صلى الله عليه وسلم “من التمس رضا الله بسخط الناس رضي الله عليه وأرضى عليه الناس” وفي لفظ “عاد ذاموه من الناس حامدين له”. وفي لفظ “عادوا راضين له” . أسأله جل وعلا أن يزيدها ثباتا وأن يملأ صدر خادم الحرمين وصدر ولي عهده وصدر أصحاب السمو الأمراء والمسؤولين في هذه الدولة على مختلف مجالسهم وأعمالهم وسائر من في هذه البلاد أن يملأ قلوبهم بالإيمان كما أسأله جل وعلا أن يوفق ولاة المسلمين في كل مكان في هذا الشهر المبارك وعلى رأسهم في ذهني وقلبي ولي أمرنا وأعوانه أن يوفقهم جميعا لنصرة هذا الدين وإيضاح الحقائق لأعداء الإسلام وبيان أن هذا الدين الإسلامي هو الدين الحق الذي قال الله عنه “ومن يبتغ غير الإسلام دينا فلن يقبل منه”- الآية “إن الدين عند الله الإسلام” وأن يديم علينا شرف هذا الانتساب وأن يبارك في قيادتنا ويرزقها حسن تقدير الأمور وجودة الاختيار لأهل العمل وأن يمتعنا بصحة خادم الحرمين الشريفين وسمو ولي عهده و سائر المسلمين في هذه الدولة وأن يديم ثبات هذا الملك لأسرة آل سعود التي قامت أول قيامها مع شيخ الإسلام محمد بن عبد الوهاب على نصرة العقيدة وتحكيم الشريعة وحراسة الأخلاق و أن يديم ثبات هذه الدولة وتوارث حكمها لأحفاد ذلك الإمام الذي قام يوم قام ولم يكن أعز من في البلاد ولا أقواهم قوة وجيشا ومنعة ولكن صاحبه وتمسك بما هو أقوى شيء في الوجود صافح العقيدة الصافية وصاحب الشريعة الحنيفية السمحة ودافع عن الملة الحنيفية فأعلى الله قدره وثبته وأورثه هذا الملك العظيم”.
ثم ختم الشيخ اللحيدان حديثه بـ”السؤال من الله جلت قدرته وعلا مكانه واستوى على العرش أن يهدي ضال المسلمين ويفرج كرباتهم وينصرهم على أعدائهم ويقضي دين كل مدين من المسلمين ويشفي كل مريض من المسلمين ويحقق للأمة الإسلامية في هذا الشهر المبارك العزة والشرف والمجد والارتقاء كما أسأل الله جل وعلا أن يحفظ المسلمين في كل مكان وأن يصون هذه الدولة ويحفظها من كيد الأعداء وتربص المجرمين وأن يصلح شعبها كله، إنه جل وعلا مجيب الدعاء وآخر دعوانا أن الحمد لله رب العالمين وصلى الله وسلم وبارك على نبينا محمد”.

الشيخ اللحيدان يرد على من حرف فتواه حول جواز قتل ملاك

الفضائيات

09.06.08

The truth about Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him)

Posted in 1, Family, Life, Music, News, personal, ادب, عام tagged , , , , , , at 4:55 pm by mhr2

The truth about Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him)

Loving him is following him

Muslims all over the world are deeply hurt by the recent caricatures of our beloved Prophet Muhammad , in Danish and several other publications.

Every now and then, some Western media outlets provoke Muslims by insulting the Prophet Muhammad . The baiting often succeeds in eliciting Muslims’ outrage and sporadic violence.

The latest incident started with a Danish newspaper’s caricature portraying the Prophet Muhammad as a terrorist. To add insult to injury, Norwegian, French, German, Dutch and a few other newspapers reprinted the defamatory cartoons to “defend”—they claimed—the freedom of expression.

The real issue is not the freedom of expression. Free speech is not and was never meant to be absolute. There are laws in the West that ban certain kinds of speech, including those that incite anti-Semitism, racism and violence. Moreover, some countries have laws against blasphemy and defamation. To Muslims, banning blasphemy against Allah and the Prophet Muhammad has a higher priority.

For the European newspapers to reprint the offensive cartoons to show solidarity with their Danish counterpart seems akin to the plot the leaders of Quraysh had hatched to assassinate Prophet Muhammad .

The Quraysh masterminds had figured that including representatives from major tribes of Makkah in the heinous plot would make it impossible for the Prophet’s clan, Banu Hashim, to avenge. But Allah willed that the Prophet Muhammad would migrate to Madinah unscathed while the plotters laid siege to his house.

The West often underestimates the Muslims’ reverence for their beloved Prophet Muhammad, (sallallallahu alayhi wa sallam) and is, therefore, staltred by the fierce Islamic reaction to an insult against him. Few in the West know that for Muslims, loving their Prophet more than themselves is a matter of faith, not choice.

Further, the depiction of the Prophet Muhammad , as a terrorist is a falsification of history. He was considered “Al-Ameen,” the trustworthy, by his people even before he received the Prophethood.

Once, when asked by some of his followers to invoke Allah’s wrath on the enemies, he refused saying he had been sent as a mercy unto mankind.

Objective Western intellectuals have acknowledged the superior character of Prophet Muhammad . In his “The 100, a Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History,” Michael H. Hart ranked Prophet Muhammad, (sallallallahu alayhi wa sallam) No. 1 because “He was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular levels.”

Alphonse de Lamartine, a renowned 19th Century French writer, had this to say about the Prophet Muhammad : “As regards all standards by which human greatness may be measured, we may well ask, is there any man greater than him?”

Unfortunately, some Muslims forget that loving their Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) means following him. Burning Danish embassies, as they did in Damascus and Beirut, to avenge the insult to the Prophet Muhammad is a complete disservice to him. Our violent reaction only plays into the hands of those who wish to reinforce the negative stereotypes about Muslims.

Do Muslims need reminding that Prophet Muhammad , forgave the people of Ta’if who had rejected his message of monotheism and pelted him with stones, bloodying him? Islamic tradition has it that when Jibreel (Archangel Gabriel) sought his permission to punish the perpetrators, the Prophet , instead prayed that some day the inhabitants of Ta’if would leave their idols and worship Allah alone. Within a few years they did.

Prophet Muhammad’s, (sallallallahu alayhi wa sallam) servant once noted his forgiving disposition, said, “I served the Prophet , for ten years, and he never said ‘uf’ (a word indicating impatience or discontent) to me and never blamed me by saying, `Why did you do so or why didn’t you do so?” (Al-Bukhari and Muslim)

Prophet Muhammad’s, (sallallallahu alayhi wa sallam) archenemies hated his Message and hurled malicious insults at him, to which he responded with forbearance. Years later when he, sallallallahu alayhi wa sallam returned as victor to Makkah, his city of birth which he was forced to leave, he asked its awed citizens, “What do you think I’m going to do to you.” They said, “You are a noble brother, son of a noble brother; we expect only good from you.” The Prophet responded with a general amnesty.

Let Muslims not forget that the Prophet , encouraged freedom of expression. In the Battle of Badr, he changed the battlefield against his own opinion due to the passionate advice of some young soldiers.

Part of the West’s success today is the freedom of expression, of thought, of religion—that draws Muslims to it from their oppressed societies. For that, Muslims should be thankful to the West. After all, freedom is an Islamic value that the West has embraced while Muslim societies have forsaken.

Defending Prophet Muhammad requires allowing freedom and practicing compassion and forgiveness, like he did. In his lifetime he , bore insults with magnanimity and devoted his time to spreading the Message of Allah. In fact, he never avenged anyone for a personal offence. Can we really respect him by violent retaliation?

Muslims should turn this extremely painful incident into something positive, by teaching the world what the Prophet , means to us and what his life was like.

As for the West, there really is a need to reexamine the notion of free speech. Without safeguards, the exercise of this freedom can be lethal, as we have seen.

One may ask, is it morally defensible to provoke violence, cause death, and create a civilizational conflict for one cartoonist’s freedom of expression?

The West already has laws to protect religious freedom, which Muslims and other peoples of faith admire. What it now needs to do is protect this freedom from being trampled by unbridled free speech. No one should have to insult Prophet Muhammad, Jesus, or Moses, may Allah exalt their mention to speak freely.

We can turn these negative, malicious cartoons into something positive by learning about the Prophet , by following him, and educating others about his teachings.

Allah described the Prophet in the verse (which means): “And verily, you (O Muhammad) are on an exalted standard of character.” (Quran 68:4)

And (what means): “Indeed in the Messenger of Allah there is a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the meeting with) Allah and the Last Day and remembers Allah much.” (Quran 33:21)

By a divine decision, the status of Muhammad was raised forever, as in the verse (which means): “And (has Allah not) raised high your fame?” (Quran 94:4)

Muslims were commanded to lower their voices low in the presence of the Prophet , out of respect, as in the verse (which means): “O you who believe, raise not your voices above the voice of the Prophet, nor speak aloud to him as you speak aloud to one another lest your deeds be rendered fruitless while you perceive not. Verily, those who lower their voices in the presence of Allah’s Messenger, they are the ones whose hearts Allah has tested for piety. For them there is forgiveness and a great reward.” (Quran 49:2-3)

While other prophets were sent to their own people, Muhammad was appointed as the Messenger to all mankind. And such he was asked to declare (what means): “Say (O Muhammad): `O mankind, verily I am sent to you all as the Messenger of Allah – to Whom belongs the Dominion of the heavens and the earth.” (Quran 7:158)

On the Day of Judgement he will be the only Messenger to intercede with Allah to seek forgiveness for the wrongdoers.

As blasphemous as the drawings are, we believe that behind all events there is Allah’s pre-decree and wisdom that mortal beings fully understand only in hindsight. In the end, this deeply hurtful incident would be seen as benefiting the image of the Prophet .

A case in point is the verse (which means): “Verily, We have given you (O Muhammad) a manifest victory.” (Quran 48:1)

When this verse was revealed, even some of the most exemplary Muslims could not understand how being prevented from performing pilgrimage by the enemies could be a manifest victory. Prophet Muhammad had just signed a treaty with non-Muslims of Makkah that imposed unfair restrictions on Muslims.

The Prophet swore by Allah that no matter how restrictive this treaty seemed, it was a clear victory for Muslims. Within a few years, the victory became abundantly clear when Muslims marched into Makkah, not just as pilgrims but as victors.

Our love for the Prophet Muhammad cannot be expressed except by following him. If we did that, we will see how Allah can change this painful incident into a great opportunity for the Islamic cause.

http://www.islamhouse.com/p/132779

09.04.08

A Letter Addressed to Intellectual and Opinion Leaders in the ‘West’

Posted in 1, Family, Life, Music, News, Politics, personal, ادب, حوارات ولقاءات, خواطر وشعر, عام, مقالات tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , at 12:45 am by mhr2

A Call for Reassessment

A Letter Addressed to Intellectual and Opinion Leaders in the ‘West’

From the Conference on

Glorification of the Sanctities of  Islam

Held in Kuwait city, Kuwait, January 22-24, 2007

- Preamble

In the name of Allah, the Unique One, who is no God but He, and no one deserves to be worshiped but He, the Lord of the prophets: Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad, the seal of all prophets, (Peace be upon all of them).

This letter was drafted by a group of Muslim scholars and intellectuals who recently gathered to discuss development in the relationship with the ‘West’, and the best and most logical manner to deal with the acceleration of infringements on the sanctities of Islam and Muslims by individuals, and by governmental, religious, and media organizations in the ‘West’.

We, the signatories to this letter, address western thinkers, intellectuals, and decision makers as well as the leaders of grass-root movements and religious institutions. To all of them we state the following regarding this current phenomenon:

When an entire nation faces repeated and accelerated aggressions directed towards what is respected and holy to its people by groups from other nations, reactions will emerge and questions will be raised as to the rationale behind these transgressions, and the environment which created the milieu for these continued attacks. Nonetheless, it is for the benefit of all humanity that these transgressions and attacks come to an end.

No other community on the face of the earth today suffers from occupation, injustice and transgression from certain western forces more than Muslim world. No other peoples or nations are currently mocked, ridiculed, and hence suffered because of the western attacks on their religion and their holy symbols as much as the Muslim world. This phenomenon has reached an unacceptable level of infringement and injustice considering that these actions are directed at a worldwide culture and exceptional civilization with an immense history and against a divine religion representing more than a quarter of the world population. For this reason, we believe it is important to draw attention to our position concerning this phenomenon to allow for mistakes to be addressed and path to be rectified.

- Present Relationship

We realize that the western perspective regarding Islam was not initially positive for several reasons, the most important of which is that Europeans did not deal directly with Islamic culture which led to a continuing sense of unease and apprehension. Disunited Europeans eventually attempted to create a Christian front against Islam. Islam became the exterior enemy capable of unifying a Europe which was until then no more than scattered groups killing one another.

There is no doubt that generalizations may lead to misjudgments. In this regard, we are aware of how Europe and America have attempted over past centuries to rid themselves of the western civilization’s deficiencies in dealing with the concept of ‘Others’.  However, incidents during the past few years have totally shattered these attempts.

In this letter, when we address the ‘West’, we mean western society in general.  We are not only addressing the forces antagonistic to Islam, but also those who are fair, and we realize that the ‘West’ is diverse.

- Examples of Aggressions

We draw the attention of the intellectuals and opinion leaders of the ‘West’ to the gravity of the increasing and accelerating attacks.  It is unconceivable and unacceptable to witness – in less than three years – a series of attacks on what is sacred to us beginning with an assault on our Lord’s holy book (the Noble Quran) by the authoring, publication and distribution of a parody of the Quran in which the beliefs, legislations, ethics, and history of our religion are ridiculed.  This was followed by a prejudiced and malicious campaign against the person of our Prophet (peace be upon him) describing him with the most repulsive attributes and picturing  him with the most mocking and ridiculing caricatures.

The source of these attacks emerged from a Danish newspaper spreading to several European countries where certain news outlets supported and others encouraged the spread of these caricatures.  The situation grew even worse when the Roman Catholic Pope described Islam, the Quran, and the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) in a prepared public speech with attributes that are unjust, to say the least.

Muslims worldwide are also closely following the repeated assaults on the noble Quran at the hands of American soldiers in detention centers of Abu Ghraib in Iraq and Guantanamo in Cuba where the degradation of human beings was coupled with the humiliations of the Quran.

It continues to surprise Muslims worldwide to follow the news about infringements of personal freedoms of Muslim citizens and residents in the largest capitals of western countries.  Let us also not forget the repeated attacks on mosques in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan sometimes through direct destruction, or by other means such as forced entry into mosques under the pretext of rooting out and killing militants, which, in turn, leads to the killing of innocent people inside these mosques.

There is also an air of superiority transpiring from the sayings of many leaders and politicians, the writings of some thinkers, and also in diverse media productions such as movies, series and novels that made it a habit of stigmatizing Islam with defects, violence and terrorism.

We are perplexed by the continued lack of public outcry from the majority of intellectual and opinion leaders against these repeated acts of aggression which occur in your countries in the ‘West’. It leads us to question which side you belong to: the side of freedom for all, protecting human rights of others, and supporting the global ethic of respect, or the side of repression and curbing other people’s desires to preserve their own identities?  We indeed ask:  Are you siding with the insolence and mockery of the prophets in the name of the freedom of expression, or siding with freedom against the phenomenon of repression and suppression?

- The Attack on the Prophet of Islam (Peace be upon him)

Although some civilizations have engaged in wars against Muslims in the past, most have not retained the hatred heritage toward the Prophet of Islam when compared with the small countries of Europe and their churches at the same time.  Furthermore, Christian animosity toward Islam and the Prophet of Islam outside of western Europe were never transformed into what has been observed in western Europe; an historical abhorrence which was celebrated and emphasized during religious occasions and was portrayed on the walls and ceilings of cathedrals and houses of worship.  It is a phenomenon worth studying and it is more important to limit its negative impact.

We question the reasons behind the endeavors of certain people in the ‘West’ to destroy the reputation of historical and contemporary role models. For those who live with no role models, we believe they will have no future; and a nation with no sense of history is like a building with no foundation.

Is this, perhaps, the fundamental raison d’etre for the focused attack on our Prophet? Do certain movements in the ‘West’ – calling for materialism and decadence – want human beings in general, and Muslims in particular, to abandon their desire to follow the steps of enlightened historical role models?

We are convinced that attacks such as these recent ones on the best role models in our tradition are nothing but a clarion call in a chain of events attempting to eradicate the historical value of these exemplars.

We remain confident that the Muslim world will never waver when it comes to defending the Prophet of Islam and all other Prophets. This is a dividing line which we will never allow it to be crossed on the false pretext of free expression of opinions or views.  Furthermore, the Muslim world can not be forced to accept all the outcomes of  freedom of expression in the ‘West’ just as the ‘West’ does not want to accept some of the outcomes of other human freedoms in the ‘East’.

We call upon western intellectuals to take a strong stance in dealing with these attacks. We expect they will be more concerned with protecting the accomplishments of the western civilization rather than protecting the ‘rights’ claimed by some in the ‘West’ to scorn others and ridicule Prophets.

- The Aggression on Al-Aqsa Mosque (The Mosque of all the Prophets)

We consider the occupation and repeated attacks on Al-Aqsa mosque to be yet another example of aggressive behavior on what is considered sacred and holy to Muslims everywhere. These transgressions are happening with the support or silence of most western governments and the approval of some western religious movements as well.

It is worth noting that the Veto right of United States of America is rarely used in the United Nations for any purpose but to defend repeated Zionist attacks on occupied Palestinian land and to protect Jewish domination on Al-Aqsa mosque, which Muslims worldwide will never forfeit.

We reiterate our inquiries to the intellectual and opinion leaders: What is your position regarding these transgressions on what is sacred to Muslims in Palestine, and regarding injustices incurred by the Palestinian people who are deprived of their most basic rights.

We observe the blatant contradiction of the ‘West’ when it calls upon Muslims to adopt western forms of democracy while the same western governments agonize over what kind of free elections and what form of government Palestinians can be free to choose.

The silence of western intellectuals and thinkers about these transgressions on what is sacred to Muslims in Palestine is humiliating; it is a stain on the foreheads of those who champion freedom and democracy in the ‘West’.

We call upon you to remove this stain by joining forces with many impartial intellectuals worldwide who are actively defending the rights of peoples and nations to liberate their occupied lands, to recover their holy sites, to fight for their rights to freely choose their representatives and those who would manage their political and social affairs, to retain their human dignity and their ability to resist humiliation and occupation, and to stand against injustice using all legitimate means.

- Mocking the Islamic Veil

Personal freedom is central to western democracies. It can be seen in western contemporary social life and also in intellectual literature. It should then be one of the fundamental rights of women in a democracy to have the personal freedom to choose their own clothes as far as they are not contradicting any general moral or social value.

The Muslim world is astonished to watch the increased attacks and mockery of the veil of Muslim women in the ‘West’. These attacks directly contradict democratic principles which are currently being promoted in the Muslim world. The world’s women-rights groups have not taken any concerted steps to defend the rights of Muslim Women. We cannot help but wonder how the right of nudity is accepted and defended while the right of decency is attacked and questioned?

One of the basic human rights in the ‘West’ is the right for one’s identity to be preserved and even protected and not attacked. How can the ‘West’ allow attacks on its own Muslim citizens for exercising the right to wear what suit them? Furthermore, we ask: what happened to the religious, social, and intellectual heritage of the western world? Modest western women would –and still do– wear decent clothing which closely resemble the Islamic dress code as in the cases of nuns and countryside women?

If the ‘West’ has abandoned this legacy of decency, does it mean the rest of the world must follow suit?  We reject the ‘war on decency’ in today’s world.  We also do not accept the notion that this is the price to be paid for modernity and prosperity. Could the attacks on the veil of Muslim women result from the fact that, in itself, it represents just another symbol of decency?

The laws and regulations that were passed recently by several European countries to limit the rights of women to wear the veil appear to be a clear negation of their civil liberties.  We wonder: is this happening because of a continued sense of animosity toward Islam by some, or because of the anti-decency position of some liberal supporters, or is it simply to please supporters of social and moral decadence? These are questions directed at western thinkers and intellectuals by the Muslim world.  Our expectation is that they must stand firm against double standards in western intellectual norms which this phenomenon points to.

- Confrontation of Ideas

Islam has been stained with numerous accusations in the last few years by a group of thinkers and religious and political personalities in the ‘West’.  The accusations range from allegations that Islam has spread by the sword, that ‘Reason’ has no place in the Islamic intellect, that Islam is a religion of terrorism and backwardness, and other false accusations.

This letter does not aim at providing a detailed refutation of each of these allegations. We, nevertheless, highlight the fact that they contradict rational discussions and also breach basic research principles accepted worldwide. It seems, however, that these allegations correspond well with the policy of ‘War of Ideas’ which some American influential institutions are calling for in order to alter Islam.

We recognize that Islam has propagated through Jihad for the cause of Allah and it also has spread by other peaceful means. In fact, all civilizations have acquired and used force to preserve and defend their accomplishments and values.  Moreover, we draw your attention to the fact that the concept of ‘Just War’ was accepted by the European Church and the secular movements in order to preserve the interests of the western civilization. Why then deny the same philosophical position when it comes to Islam?

Any person studying world history would realize that millions of people in many countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines as well as some Asian and African nations have accepted Islam even though they were never invaded or attacked by any Muslim military force.

Another question: Why does Islam continue to grow worldwide nowadays and more particularly in the ‘West’ with no use of any military force to propagate it?  It is happening, we believe, because of Islam’s inherited influence and its harmony with the best of human nature.

As for the fundamental place of Reason in Islamic civilization in comparison with other civilizations, we must begin by stressing that historians unanimously agree that western history is full of incidents which either disregard the role of reason or idolize it; thus in fact, moving from one extreme to the opposite.

On the other hand, the Muslim world has been known for its moderation in the use of reason to properly serve humanity.  We ask: why do certain religious leaders in the ‘West’ try to attack the role of reason in Islam? Is it to conceal deficiencies they encounter within their own faith, or to align forces with the secular movement in its confrontation with Islam?

We call upon Church leaders to reexamine their own beliefs beginning with the concept of divinity.  Upon rigorous introspection and research, they will perhaps recognize the more-than-ample rational contradictions that this concept holds.  The overpowering domination of Church leaders and their hostility towards science and reason could have been the main reason for the revolution against the Church in the past, and could also have inspired the materialistic and atheist wave which has developed throughout western countries.

We invite western intellectuals and thinkers to unshackle themselves from an intellectual position that was inherited from unjust religious wars, which the ‘West’ itself called ‘Crusades’; wars that perfectly fit today’s definition of ‘terrorist warfare’.  As for those who accuse us today of terrorism, they were and still are the cause of most of the horrors and catastrophes of wars that have decimated tens of millions of persons in our contemporary world, especially the two World Wars, which the Muslims had no role in igniting.

Intellectuals in the Islamic world continue to notice the changes taking place in the tactics used by some adversaries in the ‘West’ who are shifting their position from attacking Muslims to attacking Islam, and from efforts to change Muslims to attempts to ‘reform’ Islam.  We pronounce: Islam is in no need for a contemporary Protestantism, which would corrupt it, because Islam is well known for its ability to renew itself.  Furthermore, Islam is spreading with no need to modify it. We question then, why some in the ‘West’ demand to alter Islam?

It is interesting for us to note that extreme egoism has caused some western intellectuals and decision makers to call for intellectual and religious reforms in a faith in which they barely know.  They call for the reform of Islam simply because it is different from what was agreed upon in contemporary Christianity when it merged with western liberalism to form a new religion whose followers are arrogant enough to demand that others must change their own positions to match and adhere to the norms of this new religion.

We are confident that our religion, which will never be altered, is quite capable of healing the problems of western civilization.  This may explain the uphill struggle of some opponents in the ‘West’ who are trying to get rid of the pure form of Islam. Furthermore, we believe that to maintain an unaltered Islam would obliterate for some the ‘End of History’ myth.

We strongly reject any attempt to repress the right of our community to adhere to its own intellectual reasoning system.  We affirm at the same time our interest to get acquainted with other civilizations and to benefit from what they have, and is useful to us.

It is important to stress that the western thoughts in the domain of values, morals, legislation, and creeds are neither universal nor sacred.  Attempts to make them as such will never succeed.  Muslim societies in general are beginning to believe that attacks on Islam by some westerners under the banner of ‘War of Ideas’ only reflect their own fear of the enlightened message of Islam which stands firm against western domination.

What you are accustomed to call the ‘War of Ideas’ is a preference which we do not approve of.  Nevertheless, we will never hesitate to face up to whatever hurts our sentiments. The theatre of war in the field of ideas is our own battleground. We will excel in this war not necessarily because of the superiority of our intellectuals or decision makers, but rather because of our unwavering confidence and certainty in our fundamental principles.  We are confident of our ability not only to reveal, but also to cure the severe contradictions western civilization has in the domain of ideas, intellect, and beliefs.

- How to Explain the Attacks on our Sanctities?

It appears from the official statements of some western leaders and from verbal or written opinions representing the prevailing intellectual trend today that the attack on the Islamic world is not an isolated event or in response to a specific incident.  It rather appears to be the outcome of a master plan that was carefully constructed to eclipse the impact of the Islamic community on the world.

The development of this master plan could be detected in the use of the word ‘Crusade’ used by U.S. President George W. Bush in describing his open war on what is being called ‘terrorism’ in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere.

It could also explain statements by the former Italian Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi, who claimed that western civilization was superior to that of Islam. Berlusconi said that Islam was ‘racist, inflammatory, and uneducated’ ignoring Islam’s long history of accomplishments. Such statements were also echoed by the former German Chancellor who remarked that he would not allow Islam to become a threat to the European civilization. An important question comes to mind here: What is the real purpose of this multifaceted attack on Islam?

If the explanation is the freedom of expression in criticizing other religions, then we do not see in contemporary western literature similar attacks on other religions such as Hinduism, Judaism, and Buddhism.  We only observe continuous attacks on Islam. We also wonder: could this campaign of aggression be in response to recent political incidents? We must also disagree with this reasoning because aggressions against Islam have long preceded the recent events when a small group of Muslims has been accused of initiating aggression.

Many Muslim leaders and intellectuals perceive current attacks on Islamic rituals and sanctities as a direct result of the realization of some western leaders and intellectuals that the Islamic world is experiencing a revival, and is going through a fundamental renaissance.  It also appears they realize that the Islamic world is resuming its mission to reform humanity to bring real happiness, and that Islam is becoming a real contender in intellectual and civilizational areas.

We examine with interest the report published by the ‘Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance’ which estimated the number of Muslims in 2003 to be 1.226 billions representing 19% of the world population that year.  The report also confirms that Islam is the only religion whose adherents’ proportion is increasing while the proportion of the other major religions’ adherents is decreasing.  The organization also predicts that before 2023, Islam will be the world’s first religion.  Could these and other similar statistics be the driving factor behind the return of the fear of the Islamic world among certain western thinkers and leaders? The question is directed to you.

We are convinced of double-standards when we witness western leaders and intellectuals stress upon the value of individual liberty and democratic processes while at the same time they suppress freedom rights for Muslims in western countries.  They promote the intolerance of Islamic symbols appearing in the daily lives of Muslims in the ‘West’, and even attempt to harm Muslims in their own homelands.  Moreover, they continuously export oppression and colonial domination to the Islamic world.

We notice that the atmosphere of hostility from some western leaders has permeated some populations under the effect of the media and the hostile policies which are being falsely justified both culturally and intellectually.  We believe the western media is no longer completely independent from policymaking.  It rather appears sharing roles with decision makers.  As a result of the media’s ability to incite people and disseminate policies, a more dangerous effect is also developing: It is the deterrence of nations from accepting the divine guidance.

It is interesting to note that the religious movement in the ‘West’ has strongly participated in this campaign by either concealing the truth about Islam, attempting to defame it and alienate people away from it, or by hiding the explicit ‘Good News’ pointing to of the prophet-hood of Muhammad (Peace be upon him) in the Old and New Testaments.

There is another trend of concerted political and media attacks on any impartial western writing which appears to be unbiased towards Muslims.  This trend confirms to us that certain western political and intellectual forces consider it in their best interest that people in the ‘West’ get a somber image of Muslims and the religion of Islam.

- In Conclusion

We affirm the importance of proper inter-cultural dialogue in reaching the truth and limiting unjust aggression on others. Nonetheless, we are certain that talking about dialogue for some people is nothing more than a way to justify actions of the ‘West’ and to suppress the dissenting opinions and the authentic Islamic thinking and ideals. We stress the fact that communication between civilizations is quite possible in today’s world but on the condition of establishing justice and fairness.

The contemporary western civilization is an outcome of the accumulation of the accomplishments of all previous world civilizations and their civic and progressive creativities. Nevertheless, the ‘West’ desires to monopolize its benefits for itself, and only for those who circle in its orbit. The ‘West’ appears to be adamant about depriving the Muslim world of the means of technological and materialistic progress to keep it occupied with inter-fighting and struggles fueled and instigated by the ‘West’ itself.

The stagnation of Muslims in development and creativity – due to many reasons – is an exception to the norms of the history of the Islamic civilization. This stagnation does not indicate that we are a backward community in terms of civilization or values. On the contrary, the Muslim world community encompasses a wealth of morals, ideals, values, and sources of guidance and enlightenment, and it will never abandon them.  It will always carry the responsibility of calling humanity to these virtues.

We call upon you to reconsider the position of claiming civilizational supremacy over others. We further urge intellectual and opinion leaders among you to maintain neutrality and fairness with regard to Islam, its noble values, and its good virtues which has bequeathed humanity over ages.

The current situation of our Islamic world might not be great, but the foundations of Islam in creed, legislation, civilization, and ethics are nonetheless magnificent and applicable to every time and place.   Furthermore, it is important to state that while the ‘West’ has achieved strong materialistic progress and technological innovation, the foundations of its civilization as they currently stand are not beneficial to humanity in the long run.

The defects of our current situation do not affect our conviction of the value of our religion and our civilization for humanity.  This is why we are addressing you, the opinion leaders and decision makers, and we address through you the silent majority of the western peoples as well as those who are implicated in the campaigns of aggression on our sanctities and our resources and we demand from all the following:

First: Stop inflicting injustice upon us.  Bring to an end the interference in our affairs, and stop attacking what is sacred and holy to our Muslim world community. Continuing these acts of aggression will not serve your vital economic interests in our countries.  The only way to preserve these interests is through justice and fairness.

Second: We call upon you to join forces with us to stop media and cultural campaigns which insult what is sacred to us, ridicule our noble Quran, and attack the character of our Prophet. Otherwise, the Muslim community will have no choice but to continue exercising its legitimate right to resist the western oppression in all its forms: cultural, civilizational, political, and military.

Third: Rather than allocating resources and efforts on current campaigns aiming at containing and dominating us culturally, economically, politically and militarily, we urge you to allocate some of your intellectual and research efforts to determine the real causes of the rising civilizational conflict between us.  We also urge you to research and study the real essence of the message of our Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him).  We call upon you to open your minds and hearts to comprehend and appreciate the universality of Islam and the realities of our religion before attacking them, or calling people away from them.

Fourth: It is more important for western intellectuals and leaders to focus on reforming their own countries before interfering in the affairs of other nations and civilizations. The ‘West’ is undeniably in need of several fundamental reforms. It is far more imperative to tackle these reforms than to impose western reform projects on the Muslim world. We are confident that western nations and societies are heading towards a grievous abyss of incoherence, deterioration, and cultural bankruptcy if their leaders continue their approach of exporting corruption and inequalities to the rest of the world.  All these mounting abuses will eventually return back as arrows hitting the hearts of those who spread and propagate them.

To reiterate: This letter is a call to the intellectual leaders in western countries to implement a ‘Western Reform Initiative’ to rekindle the true virtues of faith which all Prophets called for, to pay due respect to these Prophets (Peace be upon them), to aid the innocent, and to prevent injustice and aggression in the entire world and not just in the ‘West’.

Before making calls to reform the Islamic world (or the Greater Middle East as they call it), the thinkers and leaders of the ‘West’ should adopt a project to reform their own societies with regard to family values, marriage and virtue.  We also call for a western economic reform, which will protect people and individuals from being ‘terrorized’ by corporations and capitalistic market forces.  This reform will bring back respect and appreciation to moral values rather than market values.  It is a reform project which will enable the ‘West’ to join global forces working together in order to stop the alienation of the underprivileged, and to reinstate intrinsic value to real education.

Now is the right time to launch this initiative to rescue the ‘West’ from the dominance of an atheist minority seeking to destroy all contemporary religious values and moral standards.

Fifth: The ‘West’ must apologize for its repeated assaults on Islam. Furthermore, it must apologize for the numerous crimes that were committed in its name against Muslims during, before, and after the colonial era.

Our message to those who are determined to continue their aggression against our Muslim community is this: The propagation of Islam never ceased when it was attacked at any time in the past nor will it come to an end if it is harassed in this era or until the end of age. The Muslim world has a unique resiliency; a capacity to rebound after setbacks as witnessed throughout history.

The role of our Muslim community will not be limited to defending our religion and what is sacred to us.  It will also extend to expose the tactics of the enemies of humanity. Citizens of the western world will come to recognize that what the enemies of Muslims in the ‘West’ are doing will harm the western world far more than it will harm the Muslim community.

The ‘West’ could possibly lose the advantages of economic trade with 1.25 billion people representing an overwhelming market share of world consumers. It will risk trade relationships with many Muslim countries, which retain a vast wealth of all current natural energy resources needed to fuel the wheel of modernity and development.  These are the same Muslims who carry the largest share of the burden of sustaining human fairness and justice.

We believe that welcoming the western technological advancements, which are beneficial to humanity, does neither indicate nor necessitate trading our own values in order to merge into western cultures. We reject blind adherence to the ‘West’ or anyone else.  At the same time, we do not object to trade and exchange benefits with the ‘West’ or to make use of its technological and industrial innovations.

We call upon the intellectual and opinion leaders in the ‘West’ to truly understand the religion of Islam, and the Muslim community. What motivates us to do so, and our evidence to it, is the divine order in the Book of Allah – The Noble Quran, which we find to be the very best way to conclude our letter to you. The glorious God states: “Say: ‘O people of the Scripture: Come to a word that is just between us and you, that we worship none but God, and that we associate no partners with Him, and that none of us shall take others as lords besides God.’ Then, if they turn away, say: ‘Bear witness that we are Muslims.’” [Quran,3:64]

http://www.islamhouse.com/p/156069